98%
921
2 minutes
20
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can modulate cortical excitability in a polarity-specific manner, yet identical protocols often produce inconsistent outcomes across sessions or individuals. This narrative review proposes that much of this variability arises from the brain's intrinsic temporal landscape. Integrating evidence from chronobiology, sleep research, and non-invasive brain stimulation, we argue that tDCS produces reliable, polarity-specific after-effects only within a circadian-homeostatic "window of efficacy". On the circadian (Process C) axis, intrinsic alertness, membrane depolarisation, and glutamatergic gain rise in the late biological morning and early evening, whereas pre-dawn phases are marked by reduced excitability and heightened inhibition. On the homeostatic (Process S) axis, consolidated sleep renormalises synaptic weights, widening the capacity for further potentiation, whereas prolonged wakefulness saturates plasticity and can even reverse the usual anodal/cathodal polarity rules. Human stimulation studies mirror this two-process fingerprint: sleep deprivation abolishes anodal long-term-potentiation-like effects and converts cathodal inhibition into facilitation, while stimulating at each participant's chronotype-aligned (phase-aligned) peak time amplifies and prolongs after-effects even under equal sleep pressure. From these observations we derive practical recommendations: (i) schedule excitatory tDCS after restorative sleep and near the individual wake-maintenance zone; (ii) avoid sessions at high sleep pressure or circadian troughs; (iii) log melatonin phase, chronotype, recent sleep and, where feasible, core temperature; and (iv) consider mild pre-heating or time-restricted feeding as physiological primers. By viewing Borbély's two-process model and allied metabolic clocks as adjustable knobs for plasticity engineering, this review provides a conceptual scaffold for personalised, time-sensitive tDCS protocols that could improve reproducibility in research and therapeutic gain in the clinic.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12345709 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells14151152 | DOI Listing |
J Comput Neurosci
September 2025
School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, China.
Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) enables non-invasive modulation of brain activity, holding promise for cognitive research and clinical applications. However, it remains unclear how the spiking activity of cortical neurons is modulated by specific electric field (E-field) distributions. Here, we use a multi-scale computational framework that integrates an anatomically accurate head model with morphologically realistic neuron models to simulate the responses of layer 5 pyramidal cells (L5 PCs) to the E-fields generated by conventional M1-SO tACS.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFExp Brain Res
September 2025
Siena Brain Investigation and Neuromodulation Lab (Si-BIN Lab), Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology Section, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Postdiction is a perceptual phenomenon where the perception of an earlier stimulus is influenced by a later one. This effect is commonly studied using the 'rabbit illusion', in which temporally regular, but spatially irregular, stimuli are perceived as equidistant. While previous research has focused on short inter-stimulus intervals (100-200 ms), the role of longer intervals, which may engage late attentional processes, remains unexplored.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNeuropsychopharmacology
September 2025
Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an emerging treatment for neuropsychiatric disorders that shows initial efficacy, safety, and tolerability in adolescents with treatment-resistant depression. As research expands to clinical trials testing rTMS in youth with other diagnoses and at younger ages, it is important to consider how neurodevelopmental factors might moderate or mediate rTMS effects and factor this into clinical trial design. In the current paper, we review how key domains of neurodevelopment may interact with rTMS, including neuroanatomy, neural circuit network topography, neuroplasticity, hormones, state-dependent effects, and psychosocial development.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNeuroimage
September 2025
Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark, Kettegård Allé 30, 2650 Hvidovre, Denmark; Institute of Neuroscience, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen N,
Background: We recently demonstrated that single-pulse TMS of the primary sensorimotor hand area (SM1) elicits an immediate transcranial evoked potential (iTEP). This iTEP response appears within 2-8 ms post-TMS, featuring high-frequency peaks superimposed on a slow positive wave. Here, we used a linear TMS-EEG mapping approach to characterize the rostro-caudal iTEP expression and compared it to that of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Hum Neurosci
September 2025
Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a neurological syndrome characterized by the gradual deterioration of language capabilities. Due to its neurodegenerative nature, PPA is marked by a continuous decline, necessitating ongoing and adaptive therapeutic interventions. Recent studies have demonstrated that behavioral therapies, particularly when combined with neuromodulation techniques such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), can improve treatment outcomes, including the long-term maintenance and generalization of therapeutic effects.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF