Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Adagrasib is a KRAS inhibitor that demonstrated promising activity against KRAS-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a phase 2 trial. Here we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of adagrasib versus docetaxel in patients with KRAS-mutated advanced NSCLC previously treated with chemotherapy and immunotherapy.

Methods: KRYSTAL-12 is a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial conducted at 230 centres in 22 countries. Patients with Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue (KRAS)-mutated locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC, who had previously received both platinum-based chemotherapy and anti-programmed cell death protein 1 or anti-programmed death ligand 1 therapy, were randomly allocated in a 2:1 ratio to receive 600 mg adagrasib (twice a day orally) or 75 mg/m docetaxel (every 3 weeks intravenously) using a centralised interactive web response system. Randomisation was stratified by region (non-Asia-Pacific vs Asia-Pacific) and previous treatment (sequential vs concurrent chemotherapy or immunotherapy). Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, investigator or patient decision, or death. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by blinded independent central review in all randomised patients (intention-to-treat [ITT] population). Safety was assessed in all treated patients. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04685135), and is active but no longer recruiting.

Findings: Between Feb 23, 2021, and Nov 16, 2023, 453 patients were randomly allocated to receive adagrasib (301 [66%]) or docetaxel (152 [34%]). In each group, 298 (99%) patients received adagrasib and 140 (92%) received docetaxel. In the ITT population (median follow-up 7·2 months [95% CI 5·8-8·7]), median progression-free survival was 5·5 months (95% CI 4·5-6·7) with adagrasib and 3·8 months (95% CI 2·7-4·7) with docetaxel (hazard ratio 0·58 [95% CI 0·45-0·76]; p<0·0001). Grade 3 and above treatment-related adverse events occurred in 140 (47%) of 298 patients treated with adagrasib and 64 (46%) of 140 with docetaxel. There were four (1%) treatment-related deaths in the adagrasib group and one (1%) treatment-related death in the docetaxel group.

Interpretation: Adagrasib demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival over docetaxel in patients with previously treated KRAS-mutated NSCLC, without new safety signals.

Funding: Mirati Therapeutics, a Bristol Myers Squibb company.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00866-9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

phase trial
12
adagrasib versus
8
versus docetaxel
8
non-small-cell lung
8
lung cancer
8
krystal-12 randomised
8
open-label phase
8
kras-mutated advanced
8
randomly allocated
8
progression-free survival
8

Similar Publications

Refractory cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a severe complication following umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT). Antiviral agents, the standard first-line therapy, are limited by toxicity and resistance without robust T-cell immunity. We evaluated third-party donor (TPD)-derived CMV-specific T cells (CMVSTs) as a treatment option.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Phase I dose escalation trials in oncology generally aim to find the maximum tolerated dose. However, with the advent of molecular-targeted therapies and antibody drug conjugates, dose-limiting toxicities are less frequently observed, giving rise to the concept of optimal biological dose (OBD), which considers both efficacy and toxicity. The estimand framework presented in the addendum of the ICH E9(R1) guidelines strengthens the dialogue between different stakeholders by bringing in greater clarity in the clinical trial objectives and by providing alignment between the targeted estimand under consideration and the statistical analysis methods.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a major clinical challenge, particularly among patients with refractory ulcers, that often lead to severe complications such as infection, amputation, and high mortality. Innovations supported by strong clinical evidence have the potential to improve healing outcomes, enhance quality of life, and reduce the economic burden on individuals and health care systems.

Objective: To describe the design of the concurrent optical and magnetic stimulation (COMS) therapy Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) study for refractory DFUs (MAVERICKS) trial.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Unraveling biomolecular interactions: a comprehensive review of the electromobility shift assay.

Photochem Photobiol Sci

September 2025

Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, C. P. College of Agriculture, S. D. Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar, 385506, India.

The electromobility shift assay (EMSA) is a popular and productive molecular biology tool for studying protein-nucleic acid interactions. EMSA is a technique applied to the revelation of the binding dynamics of proteins, like transcription factors, to DNA or RNA. There are ample essential phases in the technique.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Astrocytic monoamine oxidase B (MAOB)-gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) axis as a molecular brake on repair following spinal cord injury.

Signal Transduct Target Ther

September 2025

Spine & Spinal Cord Institute, Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Neuroregeneration and remyelination rarely occur in the adult mammalian brain and spinal cord following central nervous system (CNS) injury. The glial scar has been proposed as a major contributor to this failure in the regenerative process. However, its underlying molecular and cellular mechanisms remain unclear.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF