98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) represent an interdisciplinary clinical challenge and are not uncommonly associated with rheumatological diseases. Interstitial lung disease multidisciplinary meetings (ILD-MDM) provide a structured platform for interdisciplinary case discussions and decision making. Despite their great importance in patient care, data on the prevalence, structure and function of ILD-MDM in Germany are lacking.
Objective: The aim of the study was to assess the current status of ILD-MDM in German hospitals to gain insights into their composition, processes and potential for optimization.
Material And Methods: A web-based survey was conducted via SurveyMonkey under the auspices of the German Society for Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology (DGRh) and in collaboration with the German Respiratory Society (DGP) and the German Radiological Society (DRG). A standardized questionnaire captured information on the participating specialist disciplines, organizational structures as well as the content and challenges of local ILD-MDM. The analysis was conducted descriptively.
Results: A total of 125 physicians from 15 federal states in Germany participated. Pulmonologists (93.6 %), radiologists (86.4 %), rheumatologists (59.2 %) and pathologists (57.6 %) are the most commonly represented members of ILD-MDM. The majority of ILD-MDMs are conducted either in person (50 %) or in a hybrid format (31.5 %) and are held on a weekly basis (41.1 %). Of all patient cases discussed, two thirds receive a definitive diagnosis and treatment recommendation.
Conclusion: The findings reveal a high acceptance and prevalence of ILD-MDM in Germany but also highlight potential areas for improvement, particularly regarding interdisciplinary participation, technical infrastructure and standardization.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2625-7527 | DOI Listing |
JMIR Hum Factors
September 2025
College of Biomedical Engineering & Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Background: The rapid advancement of next-generation sequencing has significantly expanded the landscape of precision medicine. However, health care professionals face increasing challenges in keeping pace with the growing body of oncological knowledge and integrating it effectively into clinical workflows. Precision oncology decision support (PODS) tools aim to assist clinicians in navigating this complexity, yet their current functionalities only partially address clinical needs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDiabetes Ther
September 2025
Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, UK.
Introduction: This post hoc analysis of an A Toujeo Observational Study (ATOS) aims to evaluate the real-world effectiveness and safety of insulin glargine 300 U/ml (Gla-300) in high-risk subgroups of insulin-naïve people with type 2 diabetes (PwT2D) from multiple geographical regions (Asia, the Middle East, North Africa, Latin America, and Eastern Europe).
Methods: In these post hoc analyses of ATOS, a real-world, 12-month, prospective study included 4422 insulin-naïve adults (age ≥ 18 years) with type 2 diabetes (T2D) uncontrolled (HbA > 7% and ≤ 11%) on one or more oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) who initiated Gla-300 treatment as per routine practice. Primary and secondary endpoints were studied according to renal impairment (RI) status (without or with) and age group (≥ 70 years).
J Thorac Oncol
July 2025
Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Introduction: TNM staging systems create prognostic categories by anatomic extent of disease. Whether therapeutically important molecular alterations in NSCLC augment the prognostic information of TNM staging is unclear. To study this, we analyzed molecular data from the ninth edition of the lung cancer staging system.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBJPsych Bull
September 2025
Resident Doctor, Mersey and West Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Prescot, UK.
Aims And Method: This scoping review examines the literature on psychiatric in-patient ward rounds, a crucial and ubiquitous but understudied component of psychiatric care. We sought to examine the methods and perspectives used in research on ward rounds and identify recommendations for practice.
Results: The review identified 26 studies from diverse in-patient settings but predominantly UK-based, which made 21 recommendations for practice.