98%
921
2 minutes
20
Shared decision-making is central to patient-centered care but is often hampered by artificial intelligence (AI) systems that focus on technical transparency rather than delivering context-rich, clinically meaningful reasoning. Although AI explainability methods elucidate how decisions are made, they fall short of addressing the "why" that supports effective patient-clinician dialogue. To bridge this gap, we introduce artificial intelligence-supported shared decision-making (AI-SDM), a conceptual framework designed to integrate AI-based reasoning into shared decision-making to enhance care quality while preserving patient autonomy. AI-SDM is a structured, multimodel framework that synthesizes predictive modeling, evidence-based recommendations, and generative AI techniques to produce adaptive, context-sensitive explanations. The framework distinguishes conventional AI explainability from AI reasoning-prioritizing the generation of tailored, narrative justifications that inform shared decisions. A hypothetical clinical scenario in stroke management is used to illustrate how AI-SDM facilitates an iterative, triadic deliberation process between health care providers, patients, and AI outputs. This integration is intended to transform raw algorithmic data into actionable insights that directly support the decision-making process without supplanting human judgment.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12331219 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/75866 | DOI Listing |
JAMA Cardiol
September 2025
Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Importance: Consumer wearable technologies have wide applications, including some that have US Food and Drug Administration clearance for health-related notifications. While wearable technologies may have premarket testing, validation, and safety evaluation as part of a regulatory authorization process, information on their postmarket use remains limited. The Stanford Center for Digital Health organized 2 pan-stakeholder think tank meetings to develop an organizing concept for empirical research on the postmarket evaluation of consumer-facing wearables.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJAMA Netw Open
September 2025
Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Importance: Research in behavioral economics has demonstrated that people have irrational biases, which make them susceptible to decisional shortcuts, or heuristics. The extent to which physicians consciously might use nudges to exploit these heuristics and thereby influence their patients' decision-making is unclear. In addition, ethical questions about the conscious use of nudges in medicine persist, yet little is known about how physicians experience and perceive their use.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCancer Causes Control
September 2025
Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Purpose: The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends that men aged 55-69 years undergo shared decision-making (SDM) regarding prostate cancer (PCa) screening, and routine screening is not recommended for older men or those with limited life expectancy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDisabil Rehabil
September 2025
Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Purpose: Children with incomplete recovery from Brachial Plexus Birth Injury (BPBI) experience varying degrees of upper limb impairment, and 20-30% require interventions to optimize function. A psychometrically validated measure of upper limb activity capacity is essential to guide shared clinical decisions for surgical and rehabilitation interventions.
Materials And Methods: Following the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis, this systematic review included studies on the measurement properties of the Brachial Plexus Outcome Measure (BPOM) - Activity Scale, a performance-based outcome measure of upper limb activity capacity in children with BPBI.
Curr Sports Med Rep
September 2025
Department of Orthopaedics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC.
Glenohumeral instability is a common injury affecting contact and collision athletes. Male sex, younger age at time of first dislocation, and contact sports participation are risk factors for recurrent instability. MRI is the gold standard to evaluate soft tissue structures, while CT is beneficial in quantifying glenoid bone loss and identifying on-track and off-track Hill-Sachs lesions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF