98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: There remain ongoing concerns regarding the accessibility of breast reconstruction. We aimed to analyze recent data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to reveal trends in immediate and early delayed breast reconstruction across the United States.
Methods: Patients undergoing mastectomy from 2010 to 2020 were identified using the SEER database. The trends of postmastectomy reconstruction were described. Multivariate logistic regressions were performed to identify covariates associated with reconstruction. Multiple comparisons based on logistic models were employed to assess interactions among reconstruction-related factors.
Results: A total of 84,088 patients underwent reconstruction within four months following mastectomy, accounting for 36.4% of all postmastectomy patients. Immediate and early delayed reconstruction use increased from 26.4% in 2010 to 41.8% in 2020, with increased proportion of implant-based techniques over time. The receipt of reconstruction among younger patients not only demonstrated a higher proportion, but also exhibited a more significant upward trend over the years (P for interaction < 0.001). The correlation between substantial partner support and willingness for reconstruction was stronger among older patients (P for interaction < 0.001). While patients exhibiting favorable responses to neoadjuvant therapy typically displayed heightened propensities for reconstruction, this disparity was particularly pronounced among older individuals (P for interaction < 0.001).
Conclusion: Breast reconstruction has increased over time, with implant-based reconstruction being the most common approach employed. The decision-making process for reconstruction is influenced by various factors, with noteworthy interactions among them. Collaboration among patients, tumor surgeons, and reconstructive surgeons is essential for reconstruction decisions.
Level Of Evidence Iii: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-025-05115-0 | DOI Listing |
Medicine (Baltimore)
September 2025
Department of Medical and Pharmaceutical Affairs, Doctor CONSULT, Seoul, Korea.
Stakeholders in the breast implant industry in Korea have recently experienced a crisis from breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma and the first Korean case of a medical device fraud. We compared the short-term safety between the microtextured devices that are commercially available after the occurrence of breast implant crisis in Korea. The current study was conducted in a cohort of Korean women who had received an implant-based augmentation mammaplasty for aesthetic purposes between November 14, 2020 and October 13, 2022.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAdv Sci (Weinh)
September 2025
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Department of Chemistry, Hong Kong Branch of Chinese National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, The Hong Kong University of Science & Technology, Hong Kong, 999077,
Breast cancer (BC), characterized by its heterogeneity and diverse subtypes, necessitates personalized treatment strategies. This study presents MF3Ec-TBPP nanoparticles (NPs) as a promising approach, integrating an aggregation-induced emission (AIE)-based photosensitizer, TBPP, with the MF3Ec aptamer to enhance targeted photodynamic therapy (PDT) for Luminal A subtype BC cells. The nanoparticles also feature a 1, 2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-poly(ethylene glycol) shell and dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine (DPPC), which stabilize the structure and inhibit singlet oxygen generation, effectively reducing off-target effects and protecting healthy tissues.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAesthet Surg J
September 2025
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Background: Patient electronic communication (PEC) via secure messaging is important for patient engagement. While PEC has been studied in primary care, data on surgical specialties, particularly plastic surgery, remain limited.
Objectives: This study assessed the volume and content of post-discharge PECs among patients undergoing post-mastectomy autologous breast reconstruction.
Aesthet Surg J
September 2025
Department of Gynecological and Breast Surgery and Oncology, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France.
Background: Total mastectomy for breast cancer is an impactful procedure, and breast reconstruction plays a crucial role for women diagnosed with the disease.
Objectives: The objective of our study is to compare satisfaction, morbidity, and timelines of two breast reconstruction techniques after breast cancer: breast prosthesis and exclusive lipofilling.
Methods: This is a comparative, retrospective, unicentric study on patients who underwent total mastectomy between May 2014 and May 2020.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg
September 2025
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.