98%
921
2 minutes
20
The connectedness effect is the tendency to perceive connected items as fewer units, such as two connected dots seen as one. It commonly occurs with intermediate numerosity perception alongside the activity of the approximate number system (ANS), indicating that intermediate quantities are perceived as discrete units rather than continuous magnitudes. The present study explored how this effect influences the enumeration of small numerosities (fewer than 5), which are accurately assessed through a mechanism known as subitizing under normal conditions. In the single enumeration task, where participants enumerated 2-4 dots solely from the indicated target patch prior to stimulus presentation, connectivity did not induce underestimation, indicating that subitizing is impervious to the connectedness effect. Conversely, connectivity led to significant underestimation in the dual enumeration task, where participants had to simultaneously estimate dots in both patches and respond upon cueing of the target patch. Furthermore, the connectedness effect is more pronounced in the simultaneous comparison task compared with the sequential task. Weber fractions for small numerosities correlate with those for intermediate numerosities in the simultaneous comparison task, whereas no such correlation is observed in the sequential task. This suggests that subitizing prevails in single/sequential tasks, while estimation takes precedence in dual/simultaneous tasks under attentional load. The connectedness effect does not impact the subitizing mechanism in single tasks, but it occurs alongside estimation regardless of the number regime, leading to significant underestimation in dual tasks. Approximate estimation relies on segmented objects, rather than continuous magnitude, even for very small numerosities.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-025-03138-y | DOI Listing |
Atten Percept Psychophys
August 2025
School of Teacher Education, Dali University, Dali, China.
The connectedness effect is the tendency to perceive connected items as fewer units, such as two connected dots seen as one. It commonly occurs with intermediate numerosity perception alongside the activity of the approximate number system (ANS), indicating that intermediate quantities are perceived as discrete units rather than continuous magnitudes. The present study explored how this effect influences the enumeration of small numerosities (fewer than 5), which are accurately assessed through a mechanism known as subitizing under normal conditions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Exp Child Psychol
August 2025
Université Paris Cité, CNRS, Integrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center, 75006 Paris, France.
Humans use space to think, reason about, externally represent, and even talk about many dimensions (e.g., time, pitch height).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDev Sci
May 2025
Department of Developmental Psychology and Socialisation, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
The boundary effect, namely the infants' failures to compare small and large numerosities, is well documented in studies using visual stimuli. The prevailing explanation is that the numerical system used to process sets up to 3 is incompatible with the system employed for numbers >3. This study investigates the boundary effect in 10-month-old infants presented with linguistic sequences.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFVision Res
April 2025
Faculty of Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan.
It has been posited that number and space are processed with shared mechanisms. We examined whether the stimulus configuration that leads to the Ebbinghaus size illusion would change numerosity perception. We first prepared visual stimuli with which perceived densities were equated for given dot number and area size (Experiment 1).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAtten Percept Psychophys
February 2025
Bentley University, Waltham, MA, 02452, USA.
Humans can acquire behaviorally relevant information about the contents of a container through their sense of touch. A container poses a challenge to the haptic sense as it creates an intermediary between its contents and the observer. Despite this challenge, several studies have shown that individuals are particularly adept at estimating small numbers of objects in an opaque box solely through tactile interaction.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF