98%
921
2 minutes
20
The (co)representation of time and numerosity has long been a topic of enduring interest. While a theory of magnitude (ATOM) posits that these dimensions are governed by a shared representational system, empirical findings offer both supporting and conflicting evidence. Previous challenging research has highlighted that time and numerosity perception can be distorted in opposite directions by explicitly introducing emotional or cognitive interference. However, it remains unclear whether time and numerosity can spontaneously dissociate during stimulus processing. To this end, we tested the time and numerosity distortions caused by different kinds of chunked stimuli, including collinearity, illusory contours (ICs), and biological motion (BM). The results showed that collinearity caused the same amount of overestimation for both time and numerosity, whereas ICs caused only numerosity underestimation and BM caused only time overestimation. Notably, no consistent correlations emerged between the magnitudes of temporal and numerical distortion across the three stimulus types. These findings suggest that time and numerosity perception can be symmetrically or asymmetrically distorted depending on the nature of chunked stimuli, providing converging evidence for partially dissociable representations of time and numerosity. The close relationship observed between these two dimensions may instead reflect shared constraints within a broader framework of information processing.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12327536 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.25.10.1 | DOI Listing |
J Exp Psychol Gen
September 2025
Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, University of Osaka.
Everyday decision making often involves choosing between multiple alternatives, and developing unified theories for this process would benefit broad disciplines of behavioral science. A key challenge lies in explaining behavioral irrationalities that arise specifically in multialternative decisions. This study, based on preregistered procedures, investigated such nonnormative behaviors in a three-choice dot numerosity discrimination task.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCogn Psychol
September 2025
Laboratoire Cognition Langage et Développement, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium.
The mechanisms underlying numerosity perception remain debated, with some theories proposing a dedicated system for segmented items and others suggesting reliance on low-level features like spatial-frequency or texture-density. Numerosity adaptation-where exposure to one array alters the perceived numerosity of a subsequent one-has been interpreted as evidence for a numerosity-specific mechanism. However, recent accounts argue that this effect may result from filtering previously processed information.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFProc Natl Acad Sci U S A
August 2025
Psychology Department, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623.
Educational research highlights strong developmental links between numerical and spatial cognition in humans, often shaped by cultural tools like the number line. However, emerging evidence suggests that these number-space connections may reflect our evolutionary history and emerge even in the absence of cultural tools. We examined how task-naïve monkeys learn spatial and numerical concepts over time.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFImaging Neurosci (Camb)
February 2025
Institut de recherche en sciences psychologiques (IPSY) et en Neurosciences (IoNS), Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
The magnitude dimensions of visual stimuli, such as their numerosity, duration, and size, are intrinsically linked, leading to mutual interactions across them. However, it remains debated whether such interactions, or "magnitude integration" effects, arise from perceptual processes that are independent from the task performed, or whether they arise from high-level decision-making processes. We address this question with two electroencephalography (EEG) experiments in which participants watched a series of dot-array stimuli modulated in numerosity, duration, and item size, in two separate conditions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCogn Psychol
September 2025
Psychology Department, Northwestern University, 2029 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208, USA. Electronic address:
When we decide "Which is more?" for groups of physical objects or substances, we compare the groups along a quantitative dimension like numerosity or size. The nature of these comparisons is sometimes unclear, however, because the choice of dimension may be uncertain. To clarify this choice, people can rely on linguistic and referential indicators.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF