98%
921
2 minutes
20
Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction (KLEx) is an emerging flap-free surgical technique for the correction of myopic astigmatism. However, postoperative astigmatic accuracy remains variable. This study aimed to identify clinical and surgical factors that influence the outcomes of astigmatic correction following KLEx. A total of 98 patients with myopic astigmatism underwent KLEx. Manifest refraction was evaluated at three months postoperatively. Astigmatic outcomes were assessed using Alpins vector analysis. Multivariate linear and logistic regression models were used to determine associations between preoperative and intraoperative variables-such as age, eye laterality, tear film quality, sphere-to-cylinder ratio, and preoperative cylinder-and astigmatic correction parameters, including residual cylinder, correction index, magnitude of error, and angle of error. Older age was associated with larger residual cylinder and angle of error. Eye laterality and tear film quality significantly influenced correction accuracy. A higher sphere-to-cylinder ratio and preoperative cylinder were also predictive of astigmatic correction performance. The accuracy of astigmatic correction in KLEx is significantly influenced by multiple clinical and surgical factors. Awareness of these predictors may guide surgical planning and improve refractive outcomes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12295106 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm14144850 | DOI Listing |
J Ophthalmic Vis Res
September 2025
Clinical Research Development Unit, Shafa Hospital, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Purpose: To evaluate the time required for refractive error (RE) stabilization after standard phacoemulsification cataract surgery and identify preoperative factors influencing this duration.
Methods: This prospective case series study enrolled patients who had undergone phacoemulsification cataract surgery. RE stabilization was defined as 0.
Clin Ophthalmol
September 2025
Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Kladno, Czech Republic.
Aim: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of DIMS (Defocus Incorporated Multiple Segments) in comparison to control group (CTRL) in a wide age group of European progressive myopes (6-26 years).
Methods: In this prospective, non-randomised observational study, 78 myopes with progression myopia to -0.25 to -8.
Cureus
August 2025
Ophthalmology, Cornea and Refractive Surgery, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, USA.
Purpose This study aims to compare the initial three-month outcomes of a single-center experience with small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism using the VisuMax 500 (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany) versus the VisuMax 800 (SMILE Pro®; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany). This experience is compared to the US Food and Drug Administration approval studies and published literature. Patients and methods The initial 45 eyes (23 patients) that underwent SMILE with the VisuMax 500 in 2018 were compared with the initial 42 eyes (21 patients) that underwent SMILE Pro® with the VisuMax 800 in 2024.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Refract Surg
September 2025
The College of Medicine, Taibah University, Medina, Saudi Arabia.
Purpose: To present a case of synthetic intrastromal corneal ring segment (ICRS) intrusion secondary to necrosis and migration, managed by implantation of corneal allogenic intrastromal ring segments (CAIRS) within the preexisting tunnel.
Methods: A 24-year-old man with known keratoconus underwent bilateral ICRS implantation. He presented with blurred vision in the right eye 6 weeks after the procedure.
J Refract Surg
September 2025
Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Purpose: To evaluate axis-dependent visual and refractive outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in patients with interocular astigmatic axis discordance.
Methods: Seventy-five patients (150 eyes) with interocular astigmatic axis discordance were included in the study. Based on interocular axis combinations, patients were stratified into three cohorts: with-the-rule (WTR)/against-the-rule (ATR) (n = 19), WTR/oblique astigmatism (OA) (n = 39), and ATR/OA (n = 17).