Insights into bone and cartilage responses to pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation: a review with quantitative comparisons.

Front Bioeng Biotechnol

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering and PolitoBIOMed Lab, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy.

Published: July 2025


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Bone fractures and cartilage pathologies represent a heavy socioeconomic burden for the national healthcare systems worldwide. Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) stimulation has become a widely recognized treatment for enhancing bone fracture healing and reducing tissue inflammation, thereby supporting bone tissue regeneration. More recently, its effectiveness in treating cartilage degeneration and osteoarthritis has also been demonstrated. However, the effects of PEMF, particularly the underlying mechanisms related to the activation of specific signaling pathways, are not yet fully known neither correlated with the specific PEMF parameters applied. As a result, standardized protocols for PEMF treatment are lacking in clinical practice, leading to empirical application of PEMF stimulation and heterogeneity in treatment protocols. For these reasons, over the past three decades, the biological effects of PEMF on bone and cartilage tissues have been extensively investigated through both and experiments. The aim of this review is to provide a detailed overview of the performed studies, focusing on the applied PEMF stimulation parameters and the induced effects on bone and cartilage tissues. Furthermore, to enable comparisons across various published protocols and to aid in understanding the correlation between applied PEMF parameters and their resulting biological effects, we propose, for the first time, a quantitative descriptor for PEMF stimulation, termed PEMF dose, which accounts for magnetic field intensity, stimulation waveform, and exposure duration. The use of this comprehensive descriptor enabled the identification of common features across different studies and, in the future, it could serve as a valuable tool for refining PEMF stimulation protocols and establishing standardized guidelines to support bone and cartilage repair.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12287613PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2025.1557572DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pemf stimulation
20
bone cartilage
16
pemf
11
pulsed electromagnetic
8
electromagnetic field
8
effects pemf
8
pemf parameters
8
biological effects
8
cartilage tissues
8
applied pemf
8

Similar Publications

Extensive peripheral nerve injuries often lead to the loss of neurological function due to slow regeneration and limited recovery over large gaps. Current clinical interventions, such as nerve guidance conduits (NGCs), face challenges in creating biomimetic microenvironments that effectively support nerve repair. The developed GrooveNeuroTube is composed of hyaluronic acid methacrylate and gelatin methacrylate hydrogel, incorporating active agents (growth factors and antibacterial agents) encapsulated within an NGC conduit made of 3D-printed PCL grid fibers.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Bone regeneration is a complex biological process that involves the coordinated action of osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). While bone possesses an intrinsic ability to heal, large defects, delayed unions, and non-unions require advanced therapeutic interventions. Electrical stimulation (ES) has emerged as a promising strategy to enhance bone healing by modulating cellular activity, promoting osteogenic differentiation, and accelerating vascularization.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Low-frequency pulse magnetic fields (PEMF) has been proven by classic transient receptor potential channel 1 (TRPC 1) transcription activation peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ coactivator-1α (PGC-1α) increase upstream of the mitochondria calcium - axis to increase muscle and mitochondria function, and recreates the consistent with exercise induced metabolic adaptations and power to ascend.

Methods: Eighty healthy subjects with a mean age of 20 years were recruited and randomly divided into a PEMF group receiving magnetic field stimulation and a control group receiving sham treatment, with 40 patients in each group. The trial lasted for 4 weeks.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Stem cell therapies have emerged as transformative therapeutic strategies for neurological disorders. However, neurons derived from transplanted stem cells often exhibit low survival rates and remain in an immature state. While pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) may enhance neuronal differentiation, the extent of this effect and its molecular mechanisms remain poorly characterized.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Insights into bone and cartilage responses to pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation: a review with quantitative comparisons.

Front Bioeng Biotechnol

July 2025

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering and PolitoBIOMed Lab, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy.

Bone fractures and cartilage pathologies represent a heavy socioeconomic burden for the national healthcare systems worldwide. Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) stimulation has become a widely recognized treatment for enhancing bone fracture healing and reducing tissue inflammation, thereby supporting bone tissue regeneration. More recently, its effectiveness in treating cartilage degeneration and osteoarthritis has also been demonstrated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF