A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

An innovative fungal-specific targeted next-generation sequencing method: analytical performance and a single-center prospective clinical study. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Invasive pulmonary fungal infections (IPFIs) pose significant diagnostic challenges, particularly in immunocompromised patients. Accurate and timely diagnosis is crucial to improve outcomes. While metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is widely utilized, it is expensive and affected by host DNA interference. Targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) offers a cost-effective and efficient alternative for fungal pathogen detection.

Methods: We developed the Fi-tNGS assay, a targeted next-generation sequencing method, specifically designed to detect 64 fungal species. Analytical performance was validated by assessing its limit of detection (LoD), reproducibility, and resistance to host DNA interference. Subsequently, a prospective clinical study was conducted, enrolling 104 patients with suspected IPFIs. Clinical diagnostic performance was evaluated by comparing Fi-tNGS, mNGS, and conventional microbial culture against a comprehensive diagnostic standard.

Results: Fi-tNGS detected 109 pathogens, compared to 110 for mNGS and 77 for culture. The sensitivity and specificity of tNGS were 89.7% and 94.2%, respectively, outperforming culture (65.8% sensitivity, 100% specificity). Combining culture with tNGS or mNGS significantly improved sensitivity to 94.8% and 94.0%, respectively. These findings demonstrate the added diagnostic value of NGS methods for IPFIs.

Conclusions: tNGS provides accurate and efficient fungal pathogen detection, with sensitivity comparable to mNGS and superior to culture. Its cost-effectiveness and shorter turnaround time highlight its potential as a practical tool for the rapid and precise diagnosis of IPFIs in clinical settings.

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12967-025-06784-w.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12291280PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-025-06784-wDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

next-generation sequencing
16
targeted next-generation
12
sequencing method
8
analytical performance
8
prospective clinical
8
clinical study
8
host dna
8
dna interference
8
fungal pathogen
8
ipfis clinical
8

Similar Publications