A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Multiple cross displacement amplification (MCDA) for rapid detection of toxigenic as a potential point-of-care testing. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Toxigenic is the cause of infection, highlighting the critical need for rapid and easy-to-use detection. In this study, a multiple cross displacement amplification (MCDA) assay was developed to detect toxigenic and evaluated against real-time PCR and VIDAS toxin A & B assay (CDAB). The results showed that MCDA targeting the gene had a limit of detection (LOD) of 12.5 fg (2.5 copies of genomic DNA) per reaction with no non-specific amplification from other pathogens. The LOD for MCDA was the same as real-time PCR but had significantly faster detection time, detecting 500 pg and 12.5 fg per reaction in 5.7 ± 0.5 and 21.35 ± 2.2 min, respectively. Among 201 stool samples, MCDA identified 40 positive for toxigenic with a shorter average detection time of 16.08 ± 4.62 min compared to real-time PCR (39.82 ± 4.44 min). Using cell cytotoxicity neutralization assays as reference, MCDA demonstrated a significantly higher specificity (92.4%) and a positive predictive value (67.5%) than real-time PCR (80.8 and 43.2%, respectively; < 0.05). MCDA also had a significantly higher sensitivity (93.1%) and a negative predictive value (98.8%) compared to VIDAS CDAB (34.5 and 90.1%, respectively; ≤ 0.001). This was also higher compared to real-time PCR (86.2 and 97.2%, > 0.05). MCDA offers a promising screening alternative for point-of-care testing to detect toxigenic and effectively rule out non-toxigenic . It is rapid, easy to use, and has a balanced performance, making it applicable in clinical and community settings, particularly in resource-limited settings.IMPORTANCERapid detection of toxigenic is important for early intervention and outbreak control of infection in primary healthcare facilities. This study developed an MCDA assay and showed that it was rapid, sensitive, user-friendly, and a suitable point-of-care screening alternative for accurately detecting toxigenic . MCDA had the same sensitivity as real-time PCR while providing significantly faster turnaround times and improved specificity along with positive and negative predictive values. Its balanced performance and rapid detection capability make it well-suited for clinical detection of toxigenic and point-of-care testing in communities, particularly in resource-limited settings, and for potential self-testing.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12403592PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.03030-24DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

real-time pcr
24
detection toxigenic
12
point-of-care testing
12
mcda
10
multiple cross
8
cross displacement
8
displacement amplification
8
amplification mcda
8
detection
8
rapid detection
8

Similar Publications