98%
921
2 minutes
20
Introduction: Early-phase contrast-enhanced CT (CCT) is often used to plan and guide catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF), and delayed-phase images can be used to detect or exclude left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombosis. However, dual-phase CCT is associated with concerns about radiation exposure; hence, this study aimed to evaluate whether single-delayed-phase images can provide sufficient preoperative information while minimizing radiation exposure.
Methods And Results: A total of 102 patients who underwent dual-phase CCT were analyzed for pulmonary vein (PV) anatomy and LAA thrombus detection. The decrease in image quality due to the difference between early and delayed phases in 3D reconstruction did not pose a problem regarding anatomical evaluation. The PV anatomy was classified as typical or atypical, and 399 PVs were analyzed. Atypical PVs included 17 cases, with consistent anatomical details across the early and delayed phases. The mean discrepancy in PV diameter between the two phases and the correlation coefficient for the coronal view was 0.78 ± 0.16 mm, r = 0.91, and for the axial view, 0.79 ± 0.15 mm, r = 0.93. The LAA thrombi were observed in three patients, and no thrombus was overestimated in the delayed phase. The total exposure dose was 2320.1 ± 1031.0 mGy-cm in the dual-phase, 1443.3 ± 578.5 mGy-cm in the single early phase, and 876.8 ± 526.6 mGy-cm in the single delayed phase. Radiation doses were significantly lower in single-phase imaging than in dual-phase.
Conclusions: The single-delayed-phase CCT provides accurate anatomical and thrombus evaluations while significantly reducing radiation exposure. This approach could be a safer alternative for pre-ablation assessment without compromising diagnostic reliability.
Trial Registration: The University of Occupational and Environmental Health ethics committee approved the study (UOEHCRB22-067).
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jce.70002 | DOI Listing |
PLoS One
September 2025
Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, United States of America.
In the event of a large-scale radiological or nuclear emergency, a rapid, high-throughput screening tool will be essential for efficient triage of potentially exposed individuals, optimizing scarce medical resources and ensuring timely care. The objective of this work was to characterize the effects of age and sex on two intracellular lymphocyte protein biomarkers, BAX and p53, for early radiation exposure classification in the human population, using an imaging flow cytometry-based platform for rapid biomarker quantification in whole blood samples. Peripheral blood samples from male and female donors, across three adult age groups (young adult, middle-aged, senior) and a juvenile cohort, were X-irradiated (0-5 Gy), and biomarker expression was quantified at two- and three-days post-exposure.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPLoS One
September 2025
Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Heavy Ion Therapy Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for lung cancer involves complex multileaf collimator (MLC) motion, which increases sensitivity to interplay effects with tumour motion. Current dynamic conformal arc methods address this issue but may limit the achievable dose distribution optimisation compared with standard VMAT. This study examined the clinical utility of a VMAT technique with monitor unit limits (VMATliMU) to mimic conformal arc delivery and reduce interplay effects while maintaining plan quality.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Radiol Prot
September 2025
Centre for Radiation Protection Research, Stockholm University, Svante Arrheniusväg 20C, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.
The System of Radiological Protection (the "System") developed by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) is built on nearly a century of efforts of numerous scientists and practitioners working together internationally. It rests on three enduring pillars: science, ethics, and experience. These pillars support the three fundamental principles that shape radiological protection strategies: justification, optimisation, and application of dose limits.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCurr Cardiol Rep
September 2025
Division of Cardiology, Health Sciences Building, University of Washington Medical Center, 1959 NE Pacific StreetSuite #A506D Box 356422, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Purpose Of Review: Patients living with cancer are at risk for significant potential cardiovascular complications as a direct result of cancer treatment or due to underlying comorbid cardiovascular disease. This article reviews the methods of risk stratification as well as pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic approaches to cardioprotection in cardio-oncology.
Recent Findings: Several cancer-specific risk stratification tools have incorporated variables such as age, sex, cancer subtype, traditional cardiovascular risk factors and cancer treatment-related parameters to assess cardiovascular specific risk prior to cancer therapy.
Radiat Environ Biophys
September 2025
Environmental Physics Department, Institute for Energy Security and Environmental Safety, HUN-REN Centre for Energy Research, Budapest, Hungary.
Variability in radiation-related health risk and genetic susceptibility to radiation effects within a population is a key issue for radiation protection. Besides differences in the health and biological effects of the same radiation dose, individual variability may also affect dose distribution and its consequences for the same exposure. As exposure to radon progeny affects a large population and has a well-established dose-effect relationship, investigating individual variability upon radon exposure may be particularly important.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF