Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background And Objective: NRG/RTOG 0521 randomized men with high-risk localized prostate cancer (PC) to androgen suppression (AS) and definitive radiotherapy (RT) ± docetaxel-based chemotherapy (CT). The overall survival (OS) benefit with CT initially reported was lost on longer follow-up. The Decipher genomic classifier (GC) measures multiple transcripts relevant to docetaxel action. Basal/luminal differentiation portends differential response to AS and CT for high-risk localized and metastatic hormone-sensitive PC. We validated the Decipher GC in pretreatment biopsy samples for risk stratification and examined basal-luminal subtyping to predict docetaxel response.

Methods: Decipher GC scores and basal-luminal cellular subtypes were generated for specimens from NRG/RTOG 0521. The primary objective was to validate the independent prognostic ability of GC for metastasis-free survival (MFS). Treatment effects in luminal proliferating (LP) and non-LP cell subtypes were examined in relation to MFS, OS, and distant metastasis (DM).

Key Findings And Limitations: Samples were obtained from 283 patients and yielded 183 GC scores. Over median follow-up of 9.9 yr, 67 metastasis events were observed, including 34 DM events. Multivariable analysis revealed that GC was independently associated with DM (subdistribution hazard ratio 1.45) and MFS (hazard ratio 1.20). No biomarker-by-treatment interaction with GC and docetaxel was detected. The 10-yr restricted mean survival time difference in OS with CT was 13.7 mo for LP (p = 0.053) and 2.5 mo for non-LP (p = 0.63) tumors.

Conclusions And Clinical Implications: The Decipher GC score was independently associated with DM and MFS, and LP tumors may benefit from addition of CT. Validation of these findings may allow more effective use of CT in men with localized PC. The original NRG/RTOG 0521 trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT00288080.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12370384PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.04.009DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nrg/rtog 0521
12
prostate cancer
8
definitive radiotherapy
8
androgen suppression
8
high-risk localized
8
independently associated
8
hazard ratio
8
transcriptomic analysis
4
localized
4
analysis localized
4

Similar Publications

Background And Objective: Optimal management for high-risk prostate cancer is unclear. Using individual patient data from two contemporaneous North American cooperative group phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we compared the outcomes of high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with radiotherapy-based and radical prostatectomy (RP)-based treatment strategies.

Methods: Data were collected from newly diagnosed high-risk prostate cancer patients enrolled in NRG/RTOG 0521 who received radiotherapy-based treatment (2005-2009), and those enrolled in CALGB 90203 who received surgery-based treatment (2006-2015).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Objective: NRG/RTOG 0521 randomized men with high-risk localized prostate cancer (PC) to androgen suppression (AS) and definitive radiotherapy (RT) ± docetaxel-based chemotherapy (CT). The overall survival (OS) benefit with CT initially reported was lost on longer follow-up. The Decipher genomic classifier (GC) measures multiple transcripts relevant to docetaxel action.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Machine learning, particularly deep learning with convolutional neural networks (CNNs), is being used to detect prostate cancer in tissue slides, but sample type differences affect model accuracy.
  • Research tested whether CNNs trained on one type of sample (biopsy or radical prostatectomy) could effectively analyze the other type, revealing a significant drop in performance across sample types.
  • Results indicated that models performed well on their own sample but poorly on the alternative type, highlighting the need to consider morphological differences in training to improve cancer detection accuracy in clinical settings.*
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Restricted mean survival time is the expected duration of survival up to a chosen time of restriction . For comparison studies, the difference in restricted mean survival times between two groups provides a summary measure of the treatment effect that is free of assumptions regarding the relative shape of the two survival curves, such as proportional hazards. However, it can be difficult to judge the magnitude of the effect from a comparison of restricted means due to the truncation of observation at time .

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

It is unclear whether cancer patients enrolled in clinical trials have improved outcomes compared with non-study patients. We compared prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) in patients in a real-world setting (SEER-Medicare database) versus on a trial (NRG/RTOG 0521). The 7-year freedom from PCSM was superior in trial patients (92.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF