98%
921
2 minutes
20
Key Messages: What is known Occlusion with Bangerter filters designed with different translucent microscopic diffusers is an effective treatment for anisometropic amblyopia. What is new Bangerter filters were found to show an effect on slowing down ocular axial length (AL) growth. When rapid hyperopic reduction occurs in the non-amblyopic eye combined with persistently widening interocular AL differences, Bangerter filter application represents a more preferable alternative to patching for managing anisometropic amblyopia.
Purpose: Bangerter filter occlusion is an effective clinical method for amblyopia treatment. This study aimed to compare the nonamblyopic eyes elongation and refraction change of patching and Bangerter filter occlusion in treating patients with anisometropic amblyopia and to further investigate the effect of Bangerter filter on axial length growth.
Methods: This retrospective study included 54 patients with anisometropic amblyopia categorized by initial treatment: patching group (n = 24) and Bangerter filter group (n = 30). Consecutive records of both the amblyopia and nonamblyopia eyes were reviewed from baseline before treatment onset to follow-up visits during or post-treatment, including best corrected visual acuity, pneumatic intraocular pressure, spherical equivalent refraction (SER), axial length (AL), corneal curvature, binocular visual function, and accommodative function. In addition, macrostructures of three different densities of Bangerter filters and diffusion optics technology lenses were observed and compared.
Results: The nonamblyopic eyes in the Bangerter filter group had significantly lower AL increases from baseline (- 0.15 and - 0.20, respectively, P < 0.05) and significantly fewer SER reductions from baseline (0.45 and 0.57, respectively, P < 0.05) compared with the patching group at both two follow-up visits. The interocular AL difference between nonamblyopic and amblyopic eyes increased by 0.15 ± 0.27 mm in the occlusion group at the second follow-up (from baseline 0.23 ± 0.61 mm to second follow-up 0.38 ± 0.69 mm, P = 0.004), while it decreased by 0.18 ± 0.20 mm in the Bangerter filter group at the second follow-up (from baseline 0.72 ± 0.68 mm to second follow-up 0.54 ± 0.69 mm, P < 0.001).
Conclusions: Bangerter filter, as a traditional occlusion therapy, have been shown to effectively slow ocular AL growth thereby reducing interocular axial length disparity when compared to patching therapy in anisometropic amblyopia treatment. Rapid reduction of hyperopic refraction in non-amblyopic eyes combined with persistent increases in interocular AL difference may constitute a novel indication for Bangerter filter application.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12265194 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-02901-z | DOI Listing |
Eur J Med Res
July 2025
Department of Ophthalmology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing City, 100029, China.
Key Messages: What is known Occlusion with Bangerter filters designed with different translucent microscopic diffusers is an effective treatment for anisometropic amblyopia. What is new Bangerter filters were found to show an effect on slowing down ocular axial length (AL) growth. When rapid hyperopic reduction occurs in the non-amblyopic eye combined with persistently widening interocular AL differences, Bangerter filter application represents a more preferable alternative to patching for managing anisometropic amblyopia.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPatient Prefer Adherence
May 2025
Department of Optometry, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Qassim, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia.
Amblyopia treatment in children, often involving patching or atropine, faces significant challenges with adherence. Adherence to patching is often poor due to discomfort and psychosocial factors such as social stigma, while adherence data for atropine treatment remains scarce, hindering a clear understanding of patients' adherence in real-world settings. This review assesses both traditional methods and alternative strategies aimed at improving adherence, including Bangerter filters, binocular therapies, intermittent occlusion, and perceptual learning.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBr J Ophthalmol
August 2025
State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Objective: To validate a self-administered Home Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (H-ETDRS) visual acuity (VA) test and to assess its accuracy in detecting VA decline in patients with retinal diseases.
Methods: A validation group of 156 participants and a testing group of 100 participants with diabetic retinopathy and age-related macular degeneration were recruited. All participants underwent monocular distance best-corrected VA (BCVA) tests in the study eye using the standard ETDRS (S-ETDRS) charts in clinic and the H-ETDRS device in a simulated home setting.
J Multidiscip Healthc
March 2025
Senior Department of Ophthalmology, The Third Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100089, People's Republic of China.
Objective: This study assessed the sensitivity, validity, reliability, and monocular cue masking of a novel glasses-free distance random-dot stereotest system (GFDRDSS) compared with the established Distance Randot stereotest in youth with normal vision.
Methods: A total of 185 participants (17-20 years) with normal uncorrected visual acuity and eye alignment were enrolled. Distance stereoacuity was measured by GFDRDSS at 5 m and Distance Randot at 3 m.
Iperception
February 2025
National Centre for Optics, Vision and Eye Care, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Kongsberg, Norway.
Monocular blur sometimes impairs locomotion; however, it is not always clear when this will happen. Optic flow (the apparent motion of scene texture elements that occurs during self-motion) provides powerful signals about the direction of travel. Here, we test whether monocular blur impairs heading perception from optic flow compared to full vision under various levels of optic flow degradation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF