Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Followed by Chemoradiotherapy Versus Radiotherapy in Patients with Stage T1bN0M0 Esophageal Cancer.

J Gastrointest Cancer

Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Qingxiu District, No. 71 Hedi Road, Nanning, Guangxi, 530021, People's Republic of China.

Published: July 2025


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: To compare survival outcomes between endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) followed by chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy in stage T1bN0M0 esophageal cancer.

Materials And Methods: Patients with stage T1bN0M0 esophageal cancer between 2000 and 2021 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between the ESD followed by chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy cohorts.

Results: Among 71 eligible patients, 57 (80.3%) received ESD followed by chemoradiotherapy and 14 (19.7%) underwent ESD followed by radiotherapy. Before propensity score matching, ESD followed by radiotherapy demonstrated inferior 5-year CSS (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-9.58, P = 0.030), but comparable 5-year OS (HR = 1.46; 95% CI, 0.65-3.27; P = 0.362) versus ESD followed by chemoradiotherapy. After propensity score matching, no significant difference in 5-year CSS (HR = 1.76; 95% CI, 0.49-6.34; P = 0.386) or OS (HR = 1.33; 95% CI, 0.48-3.74; P = 0.585) was observed between treatment groups.

Conclusion: ESD followed by radiotherapy provides equivalent CSS and OS compared to ESD followed by chemoradiotherapy in patients with stage T1bN0M0 esophageal cancer.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12029-025-01270-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

esd chemoradiotherapy
20
stage t1bn0m0
16
t1bn0m0 esophageal
16
chemoradiotherapy versus
12
versus radiotherapy
12
patients stage
12
esophageal cancer
12
esd radiotherapy
12
endoscopic submucosal
8
submucosal dissection
8

Similar Publications

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Followed by Chemoradiotherapy Versus Radiotherapy in Patients with Stage T1bN0M0 Esophageal Cancer.

J Gastrointest Cancer

July 2025

Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Qingxiu District, No. 71 Hedi Road, Nanning, Guangxi, 530021, People's Republic of China.

Purpose: To compare survival outcomes between endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) followed by chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy in stage T1bN0M0 esophageal cancer.

Materials And Methods: Patients with stage T1bN0M0 esophageal cancer between 2000 and 2021 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between the ESD followed by chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy cohorts.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This review offers a critical synthesis of additional therapeutic strategies following endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, providing evidence-based recommendations to optimize clinical decision-making. For pT1a-EP/LPM lesions, ESD alone demonstrates curative potential with lymph node metastasis rates ranging from 0.0% to 3.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The precise indications for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in superficial spreading esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SESCC) remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the lymph node metastasis rates and outcomes of ESD for SESCC lesions ≥ 50 mm, focusing on diagnostic accuracy, short-term outcomes, and long-term prognoses.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 79 patients who underwent ESD for SESCC between January 2011 and December 2018.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is often managed with surgery, which is the first-line treatment option for stage I-III lesions. However, definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) is associated with a recurrence rate of 30% in stage I ESCC and higher rates in advanced-staged lesions. However, several patients prefer dCRT because their general condition is poor.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most prevalent cause of cancer-related death and the third most common cancer globally. Early-stage rectal cancer is defined by lesions confined to the bowel wall, without extension beyond the submucosa in T1 or the muscularis propria in T2, with no indication of lymph node involvement or distant metastasis. The gold standard for managing rectal cancer is total mesorectal excision (TME); however, it is linked to considerable morbidities and impaired quality of life.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF