Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Objective: To evaluate the predictive value of T4-L1 Hip Axis Error (HAE) and L1PA Error (L1PAE) on mechanical failure following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery, and to assess how error directionality and fusion length influence outcomes.

Summary Of Background Data: The T4-L1 Hip Axis is a novel framework for defining normative sagittal alignment by aligning thoracic and lumbar curvatures relative to the pelvis. Prior studies suggest that deviation from this axis may contribute to mechanical complications following ASD surgery. However, the impact of directionality, construct length, and specific risk factors remains underexplored.

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on 271 ASD patients who underwent fusion from L2 or above to the pelvis between 2016-2024. T4PA and L1PA were measured from six-week postoperative standing radiographs. Alignment errors (HAE, L1PAE) were calculated based on target threshold derived from prior normative studies. Multivariate logistic regression identified predictors of mechanical failures. Subgroup analyses were stratified by fusion length and error direction.

Results: HAE was a significant predictor of mechanical failure (OR=1.20 per °, P<0.001), whereas L1PAE was not. HAE remained predictive regardless of whether patients achieved L1PA targets. In short fusions, both signed and absolute value of HAE were associated with mechanical failure. Positive HAE (anterior T4 alignment) conferred the highest risk. Higher BMI and short constructs were independent predictors of increased HAE.

Conclusion: HAE is a robust, direction-sensitive predictor of mechanical failure in ASD surgery. Its predictive power surpasses L1PAE and remains significant in both long and short segment fusions. HAE Should be routinely measured and minimized intraoperatively to reduce postoperative mechanical complications.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005450DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

t4-l1 hip
12
hip axis
12
mechanical failures
8
mechanical failure
8
asd surgery
8
fusion length
8
mechanical
5
failures predicted
4
predicted achieving
4
achieving local
4

Similar Publications

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Objective: To evaluate the predictive value of T4-L1 Hip Axis Error (HAE) and L1PA Error (L1PAE) on mechanical failure following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery, and to assess how error directionality and fusion length influence outcomes.

Summary Of Background Data: The T4-L1 Hip Axis is a novel framework for defining normative sagittal alignment by aligning thoracic and lumbar curvatures relative to the pelvis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The Roussouly classification is a popular system for the categorization of spinal alignment, although the categorization of continuous measures may compromise efforts toward a precision-medicine approach to sagittal alignment in spine surgery. Vertebral-pelvic angles provide continuous measures of sagittal alignment without the risk of misclassification.

Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study of asymptomatic adult volunteers with normal spines (no evidence of disc degeneration or scoliosis).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Study Design: Retrospective cohort.

Objective: To evaluate the C2 pelvic angle (C2PA) as a novel compensatory parameter integrating C2 (center of gravity) and pelvic morphology, and its association with physical function and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The T4-L1-Hip axis concept was applied to assess individualized spinal alignment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Our understanding of the relationship between sagittal alignment and mechanical complications is evolving. In normal spines, the L1-pelvic angle (L1PA) accounts for the magnitude and distribution of lordosis and is strongly associated with pelvic incidence (PI), and the T4-pelvic angle (T4PA) is within 4° of the L1PA. We aimed to examine the clinical implications of realignment to a normal L1PA and T4-L1PA mismatch.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Different methods of sagittal alignment assessment compete for predicting adverse events after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. We wanted to study which method provides greater benefit.

Methods: Retrospective study of 391 patients operated for ASD, with > 6 instrumented levels, fused to the pelvis, and 2 years of follow-up.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF