98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Aberrant interferon signaling is a key element of various diseases, but resolving gene expression signatures that stem from different types of IFNs in tissue samples is still a challenge. Most published IFN signatures comprise genes that are activated by different IFNs: they cannot discriminate type-I (IFN-I) and type-II (IFN-II) IFN stimulation. Most often such signatures were obtained from a single expression dataset that had been obtained in a specific cellular context, and their translatability to other experimental contexts has not been demonstrated.
Results: We leveraged multiple RNA-seq datasets of IFN stimulation in a network meta-analysis workflow to obtain IFN gene signatures separating IFN-I and IFN-II. We validated our signatures in bulk and single cell RNA-seq datasets of various cellular contexts demonstrating similar or higher coherence than previously published signatures. Our IFN-II signature is broader applicable than other published signatures as it demonstrates strong performance in detecting IFN-II response in more cell types. In three SLE microarray datasets our IFN-I signature was highly coherent and correlated with disease severity better than most published signatures. In TCGA, our IFN-II signature produced distinct profiles compared to published IFN-I signatures and correlated strongly with published CD8 T cell signatures. In cohorts of three different cancer types, we observed higher signature scores of our IFN-II signature in responders than in non-responders to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy.
Conclusions: Our IFN-I and IFN-II response-specific gene expression signatures can inform on complex IFN responses in a more fine-grained way than previously possible. They can be used to assess type I versus II IFN response in gene expression data produced by different technologies, for different diseases and even different cell types in single cell studies. The association of high scores of our IFN-II signature with anti-tumor response to ICIs suggests a role as a biomarker to predict ICI response.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12231911 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-025-06628-7 | DOI Listing |
J Transl Med
July 2025
Clinical Measurement Sciences, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Oncology Data Science, Darmstadt, Germany.
Background: Aberrant interferon signaling is a key element of various diseases, but resolving gene expression signatures that stem from different types of IFNs in tissue samples is still a challenge. Most published IFN signatures comprise genes that are activated by different IFNs: they cannot discriminate type-I (IFN-I) and type-II (IFN-II) IFN stimulation. Most often such signatures were obtained from a single expression dataset that had been obtained in a specific cellular context, and their translatability to other experimental contexts has not been demonstrated.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Invest Dermatol
May 2025
Department of Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA; Department of Immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA; Department of Molecular Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institut
Cutaneous lupus is an inflammatory skin disease causing highly morbid inflamed skin and hair loss. To investigate the pathophysiology of cutaneous lupus, we performed single-cell RNA and spatial sequencing of lesional and nonlesional cutaneous lupus skin compared with that of healthy controls. Pathway enrichment analyses of lesional keratinocytes revealed elevated responses to IFN-I, IFN-II, TNF, and apoptotic signaling.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Allergy Clin Immunol Glob
May 2025
The International Center of Research in Infectiology, Lyon University, INSERM U1111, CNRS UMR 5308, ENS, UCBL, Lyon, France.
Background: Elevation of type I interferon (IFN-I) is characteristic of a group of diseases known as type I interferonopathies. Several technologies are available to monitor IFN-I, but there is no consensus on their routine use in medical laboratories.
Objective: We aimed to compare the performance of two technologies for this purpose: NanoString, which monitors messenger RNA expression of interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs), and Simoa, which quantifies IFN-α2 protein in an ultrasensitive way.
Immunity
August 2024
Department of Immunology, Center for Immunotherapy, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100005, China; Frontiers Research Center for Cell Responses, Institute of Immunology, College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianj
Prolonged activation of the type I interferon (IFN-I) pathway leads to autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Metabolic regulation of cytokine signaling is critical for cellular homeostasis. Through metabolomics analyses of IFN-β-activated macrophages and an IFN-stimulated-response-element reporter screening, we identified spermine as a metabolite brake for Janus kinase (JAK) signaling.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCell Rep Med
May 2024
Division of Rheumatology, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21224. Electronic address:
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) displays a hallmark interferon (IFN) signature. Yet, clinical trials targeting type I IFN (IFN-I) have shown variable efficacy, and blocking IFN-II failed to treat SLE. Here, we show that IFN type levels in SLE vary significantly across clinical and transcriptional endotypes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF