Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Traditional risk assessment for tongue cancer relies on clinicopathological parameters. Although tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are promising prognostic markers, their evaluation lacks standardization. This study aimed to validate established prognostic factors and introduce an artificial intelligence (AI)-based TIL assessment method.
Methods: We analyzed 139 tongue cancer cases from a single institution (2010-2017) to establish prognostic factors and developed an AI model for TIL quantification. Clinicopathological characteristics including AI- and manually assessed TILs were evaluated.
Results: The AI-assessed stromal TIL ratio exerted protective effects across all stages and demonstrated superior discriminative capability compared to manual evaluation (C-index: 0.649 vs. 0.604 for overall survival [OS]), with substantial inter-method agreement (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient = 0.796). In the multivariate analysis, a statistical model incorporating the lymph node ratio, AI-assessed stromal TIL ratio, depth of invasion grade, perineural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, and a close surgical resection margin (<5 mm) showed superior prognostic performance, with excellent discriminative power (OS area under the curve [AUC]: 0.851; recurrence-free survival [AUC]: 0.826). Stage-specific analysis revealed that advanced-stage patients were significantly affected by adverse factors and stromal TIL levels, whereas early stage patients showed trends but no statistically significant associations.
Conclusions: AI-based stromal TIL assessment outperformed manual TIL assessment as a prognostic marker. This AI approach robustly predicts survival when combined with factors such as the lymph node ratio and a close resection margin status (<5 mm). Our findings may enhance risk stratification, particularly in advanced-stage disease.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2025.107448 | DOI Listing |