98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: The Protrieve Sheath (Inari Medical; Irvine, CA) is a thromboembolic protection device for venous thrombectomy. An extended feasibility study was conducted for device use in deep vein thrombectomy and inferior vena cava (IVC) filter removal.
Methods: Twenty-two patients, including 12 (55.5%) females and 10 (45.5%) males (mean age 55.8 ± 13.9 years, range 28-81 years), underwent deep venous thrombectomy using the Protrieve Sheath for embolic protection between November 2022 and July 2024 (21 months). The Food and Drug Administration-approved modified sheath contains an extendable nitinol mesh for large vessel thrombectomy outside the heart including the extremities, ileocaval, IVC, and superior vena cava. The following demographic information was recorded: presenting symptoms, procedural indications, obstructed venous segments, Protrieve Sheath access and deployment sites, thrombectomy devices utilized (ClotTriever, Inthrill, Lightning Flash 16, RevCore), need for stent reconstruction, technical success, clinical success, procedural complications related to device access and deployment, clinically significant embolic events, procedure-related injury, hematoma, mortality, death, and removed thrombi histological analyses. Technical success was defined as successfully deploying the Protrieve Sheath funnel proximal to the thrombectomy site. Clinical success was defined as improvement in presenting venous occlusive symptoms without procedure-related venous thromboembolism. All patients were followed with bilateral lower extremity duplex ultrasounds and computed tomography venogram abdomen and pelvis at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. Patients were seen in clinic at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.
Results: The most common presenting symptom was extremity swelling (n = 19; 86.4%). Nine (40.9%) patients had malignant, and 13 (59.1%) had benign etiologies of venous obstruction. Of the 9 patients with malignancy, 5 were determined to be tumor thrombus on histological analysis (n = 5, 55.5%). Obstructed venous segments included the IVC and lower extremity (n = 13; 59.1%), isolated lower extremity (n = 4; 18.2%), isolated IVC (n = 3; 13.6%), thoracic central veins and superior vena cava (n = 1; 4.5%), and isolated thoracic central vein (n = 1; 4.5%). The Protrieve Sheath access sites included the right internal jugular vein (n = 20; 90.9%) for IVC and lower extremity obstructions and the right common femoral vein (n = 2; 9.1%) for thoracic central vein and superior vena cava obstructions. The Protrieve Sheath funnel deployment locations included intrahepatic IVC in 18 patients (n = 13; 81.8%), suprarenal IVC in 2 (n = 2; 9.1%), and superior cavoatrial junction in 2 (n = 2; 9.1%). Ten (45.5%) patients required stent reconstruction following thrombectomy. Technical success was achieved in all patients. Clinical success was achieved in 21 (95.5%) patients. No immediate device-related adverse events including mesh maldeployment of the Protrieve Sheath, hemorrhage, or clinically significant embolic events occurred.
Conclusion: Use of the Protrieve Sheath during large-bore venous mechanical thrombectomy resulted in favorable technical and clinical outcomes without device-related adverse events or clinically significant thromboembolic events. These results suggest further implementation and investigation of the devices use in complex large vessel thromboembolic disease. Comparative studies to standard technique can better quantify the potential benefits of this device.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2025.06.032 | DOI Listing |
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech
August 2025
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX.
A 58-year-old male in cardiogenic shock requiring a left ventricular assist device and veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with worsening lactic acidosis was found to have acute occlusion of the visceral aorta, celiac axis, superior mesenteric artery (SMA), and left renal artery. We describe the off-label use of the Inari ProTrieve Sheath to prevent distal thromboembolic events during mechanical aortic thrombectomy in a patient on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation who could not tolerate aortic cross-clamping. Retrograde SMA thrombectomy and patch angioplasty was subsequently performed, followed by temporary abdominal closure.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnn Vasc Surg
June 2025
Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Background: The Protrieve Sheath (Inari Medical; Irvine, CA) is a thromboembolic protection device for venous thrombectomy. An extended feasibility study was conducted for device use in deep vein thrombectomy and inferior vena cava (IVC) filter removal.
Methods: Twenty-two patients, including 12 (55.
Am Surg
May 2025
Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Irvine School of Medicine, University of California, Orange, CA, USA.
Percutaneous thrombectomy of the inferior vena cava (IVC) and complex iliocaval lesions may cause thromboembolism. The Inari Protrieve sheath is a device with a 33.5 mm funnel at the tip that can serve as embolic protection during thrombectomy procedures to mitigate the risk of pulmonary embolisms (PEs).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCVIR Endovasc
October 2024
Department of Radiology, Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Washington, 1959 Northeast Pacific Street, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Purpose: The Protrieve Sheath (Inari Medical; Irvine, CA) is designed for embolic protection during venous thrombectomy. This report describes experience with its use.
Materials And Methods: Between November 2022 and December 2023 (13 months), seventeen patients, including nine (52.
CVIR Endovasc
October 2023
Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, 330 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.
Background: Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters, while effective in preventing pulmonary embolism, can increase the risk of IVC thrombosis. IVC filter (IVCF) thrombosis can result from emboli getting trapped within the filter, extension of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), or the device's inherent thrombogenicity causing in situ thrombosis. This condition can cause noticeable clinical symptoms and complicate the removal of the filter due to the potential for thromboembolism, often resulting in temporary filters remaining unextracted.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF