98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: In ARIEL3, rucaparib maintenance significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS; primary endpoint) and long-term follow-up (LTFU) outcomes (including PFS2: time to disease progression on subsequent therapy or death) versus placebo in patients with recurrent, platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. Here we report the final analysis of overall survival (OS; key secondary endpoint), LTFU outcomes, and safety.
Methods: OS and updated LTFU efficacy outcomes were analyzed (data cutoff date: April 4, 2022) across three nested populations (BRCA-mutated, homologous recombination deficient [HRD], and intention to treat [ITT]).
Results: Patients were randomized 2:1 to rucaparib (600 mg BID; n = 375) or placebo (n = 189). Median follow-up was 77.0 months. 168 patients in the placebo arm received subsequent treatment; of these, 77 (46 %) received a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor-containing treatment. Median OS from randomization post chemotherapy for rucaparib vs placebo was 45.9 vs 47.8 months (HR 0.83, 95 % CI 0.58-1.19) for the BRCA-mutated population; no OS benefit was found with rucaparib in the HRD and ITT populations. Median PFS2 for rucaparib vs placebo was 26.1 vs 18.4 months (HR 0.67, 95 % CI 0.48-0.94) for the BRCA-mutated population. Rucaparib numerically improved PFS2 and other LTFU outcomes versus placebo in the HRD and ITT populations. Safety was consistent with prior reports; myelodysplastic syndrome and/or acute myeloid leukemia occurred in 4 % and 3 % of patients in the rucaparib and placebo arms, respectively.
Conclusions: OS was similar between treatment arms. PFS benefit with rucaparib was maintained through the subsequent therapy line. These data support rucaparib as maintenance treatment for recurrent ovarian carcinoma.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115584 | DOI Listing |
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol
August 2025
Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 402, Taiwan; Immunology Research Center, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 402, Taiwan; Department of Clinical Laboratory, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung 402, Taiwan. Electronic address:
Background: Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have become a key treatment for ovarian cancer, particularly in patients with BRCA mutations or homologous recombination deficiency (HRD).
Methods: This umbrella review synthesizes findings from 35 systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials to assess the efficacy and safety of PARPi in ovarian cancer.
Results: Across studies, PARPi significantly improved progression-free survival, with the most pronounced benefit in BRCA-mutated and HRD-positive populations.
Gynecol Oncol
July 2025
University of Colorado Hospital, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Academic Office 1, Mail-Stop B198-412631 E. 17(th) AveAurora, Colorado 80045 USA.
Objective: Rucaparib is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor with proven efficacy in multiple tumor types. The efficacy of PARP inhibition in endometrial cancer remains unclear.
Methods: We conducted a multi-institutional, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase II trial.
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd
July 2025
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
There have been major changes in the understanding of gynecologic malignancies in recent years, leading to new therapy options and subsequently to greater responsibilities for every professional treating those patients. The most significant therapeutic advances were achieved with checkpoint inhibitors (CPI), especially for endometrial and cervical cancer. In ovarian cancer the dominant and most important new substances are poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: In ARIEL3, rucaparib maintenance significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS; primary endpoint) and long-term follow-up (LTFU) outcomes (including PFS2: time to disease progression on subsequent therapy or death) versus placebo in patients with recurrent, platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. Here we report the final analysis of overall survival (OS; key secondary endpoint), LTFU outcomes, and safety.
Methods: OS and updated LTFU efficacy outcomes were analyzed (data cutoff date: April 4, 2022) across three nested populations (BRCA-mutated, homologous recombination deficient [HRD], and intention to treat [ITT]).
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev
June 2025
Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, Sri Ramachandra Faculty of Nursing, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Deemed to be University, Porur, Chennai, India.
Objective: This review aims to examine the effect of PARP inhibitors on PFS, OS, and adverse events in women with advanced ovarian cancer (OC).
Methods: The PRISMA 2020 guidelines are followed while conducting this comprehensive review. Data from 17 randomized control trails (RCT) published between 2014 and June 2024 were included.