A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

A phase II, randomized, double-blind study of the use of rucaparib vs. placebo maintenance therapy in metastatic and recurrent endometrial cancer. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: Rucaparib is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor with proven efficacy in multiple tumor types. The efficacy of PARP inhibition in endometrial cancer remains unclear.

Methods: We conducted a multi-institutional, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase II trial. Eligible patients had stage III, IV or recurrent endometrial cancer. We assigned patients with measurable, or non-measurable disease following completion of first- or second-line chemotherapy in a 1:1 ratio to receive oral rucaparib (600 mg twice daily) or placebo until disease progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Secondary outcomes were overall survival and safety. Exploratory outcomes evaluated response in relation to tumor molecular profiles and transcriptomic profiles.

Results: 79 patients were randomized, 39 received rucaparib and 40 received placebo. Median progression free survival was 28.1 months in the rucaparib arm compared to 8.7 months in the placebo group, hazard ratio 0.45; (95 % confidence interval [CI] (0.24-0.87); p = 0.02). Median overall survival was not reached in the rucaparib arm compared to 28.4 months in the placebo arm; hazard ratio 0.43 (95 % CI, 0.18-1.05). In patients treated with rucaparib, the most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events were anemia, fatigue, and neutropenia. Loss of p53 activity correlated to improved rucaparib response by transcriptomic evaluation. Traditional DNA repair homologous recombination biomarkers did not correlate with response.

Conclusions: Maintenance use of rucaparib after first- or second-line chemotherapy demonstrates promising activity and warrants further evaluation in a phase III evaluation. Adverse events were aligned with previous use of rucaparib in other tumor types and no new safety signals were identified.

Clinicaltrials: gov identifier: NCT03617679.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12398225PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2025.07.008DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

endometrial cancer
12
rucaparib
10
recurrent endometrial
8
tumor types
8
first- second-line
8
second-line chemotherapy
8
rucaparib arm
8
arm compared
8
hazard ratio
8
adverse events
8

Similar Publications