98%
921
2 minutes
20
The knee is one of the most frequently injured joints, involving various structures. To prevent reinjury after rehabilitation, braces are commonly used. However, most studies on knee supports focus on subjects with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries and do not account for muscle fatigue, which typically occurs during prolonged intense training and can significantly increase the risk of injury. Hence, this study investigates the acute effects of wearing a knee brace on biomechanics in subjects with a history of various unilateral knee injuries or pain under muscle fatigue. In total, 50 subjects completed an intense fatigue protocol and then performed counter-movement jumps and running tests on a force plate while tracking kinematics with a marker-based 3D motion analysis system. Additionally, subjects filled out a visual analog scale (VAS) to assess knee pain and stability. Tests were conducted on the injured leg with and without a knee brace (Sports Knee Support, Bauerfeind AG, Zeulenroda-Triebes, Germany) and on the healthy leg. Results indicated that wearing the knee brace stabilized knee movement in the frontal plane, with a significant reduction in maximal medio-lateral knee acceleration and knee abduction moment during running and jumping. The brace also normalized loading on the injured leg. We observed higher maximal knee flexion moments, which were associated with increased vertical ground reaction forces, segment velocities, and knee flexion angles. Subjects reported less pain and greater stability while wearing the knee brace. Therefore, we confirm that wearing a knee brace on the injured leg improves joint biomechanics by enhancing stability and kinematics and reducing pain during running and jumping, even with muscle fatigue. Consequently, wearing a knee brace after a knee joint injury may reduce the risk of reinjury.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12189066 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12060661 | DOI Listing |
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
September 2025
Orthopaedic Research Foundation of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Purpose: The purpose of the study was to identify the safety and effectiveness of an accelerated (AR) versus conservative (CR) rehabilitation regimen following surgical repair of proximal hamstring tendon avulsions.
Methods: This prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) allocated patients undergoing proximal hamstring tendon repair to either a braced, partial weight-bearing rehabilitation regime (CR = 30) or an accelerated, unbraced regime, which permitted full weight-bearing as tolerated (AR = 27). Patients were evaluated pre-operatively and at 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months post-surgery, via patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), patient satisfaction and global rating of change (GRC) scores.
Oper Orthop Traumatol
September 2025
Sektion Sportorthopädie, TUM Universitätsklinikum, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Deutschland.
Objective: Anatomical reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) with suture tape augmentation to enhance primary stability.
Indications: Acute or chronic PCL ruptures, either isolated or as part of multiligamentous injuries, in cases of symptomatic instability or failure of conservative treatment.
Contraindications: Fixed posterior drawer, active infection, bony avulsion.
J Exp Orthop
July 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Hôpital Pierre Paul Riquet, CHU de Toulouse Toulouse France.
Purpose: The aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis of the current literature on the treatment of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture with suture-augmented ACL repair (SA-ACLRep) compared to the gold standard ACL reconstruction (ACLR). The meta-analysis was designed to provide clinical outcomes, including re-rupture rates (as primary end point), knee stability, functional outcomes, return to sport and complications.
Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library up to 30 August 2024, in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)
September 2025
Bone and Joint Research Center, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
PurposeTo compare the clinical and radiological results of two double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) techniques. DB ACLR and anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) with internal brace (IB), and outside-in (OI) DB ACLR.HypothesisWe hypothesized that DB ACLR and ALLR with IB wound yield less femoral tunnel, especially femoral posterolateral bundle tunnel complications, than OI DB ACLR without ALLR because of better rotational control.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPLoS One
September 2025
Department of Orthopaedics, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Background: Patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis (OA) may benefit from wearing a valgus brace, but previous studies lacked consideration for brace wearing time, co-interventions and the brace users' perceptions. This mixed-method randomised controlled trial investigated the effectiveness of a valgus brace on knee pain and activity limitations alongside exploring user perceptions.
Materials And Methods: Participants randomised to the intervention group (n = 23) received regular care and a customisable valgus brace for 6 months while the participants randomised to the waitlist control group (n = 23) were allowed any regular care treatment except for a knee brace.