Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a common complication after cardiac surgery, leading to increased mortality, morbidity, and length of stay. Various predictive indices have been validated to identify patients at risk of developing POAF. This study aimed to compare the discriminative ability of four bedside indices that predict POAF in cardiac surgical patients.

Method: A total of 2465 consecutive patients who underwent cardiac surgery at an Australian tertiary hospital between 29 December 2015, and 31 December 2022, were retrospectively analysed. Exclusion criteria included pre-existing atrial fibrillation and transcatheter interventions. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) analysis and Hosmer-Lemeshow calibration were performed to compare discriminative abilities. A logistic regression model was constructed to evaluate independent risk factors for developing POAF.

Results: Older patients (aged > 69) were more likely to develop POAF compared to younger age groups (p < 0.001). The Atrial Fibrillation Risk Index, CHADS-VASC, HATCH and POAF scores had weak discrimination and demonstrated poor predictive ability in this cohort (AUC-ROC 0.49, 0.49, 0.50, 0.52, respectively).

Conclusion: Although previously validated in various cohorts, the four bedside predictive indices demonstrated poor discriminative ability and limited generalizability to our tertiary-hospital cohort.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12413596PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ans.70229DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

atrial fibrillation
12
cardiac surgery
12
compare discriminative
8
cardiac
5
evaluation predictive
4
predictive scores
4
scores onset
4
onset atrial
4
fibrillation cardiac
4
surgery tertiary
4

Similar Publications

Development and external validation of a clinical prediction model for new-onset atrial fibrillation in intensive care: a multicentre, retrospective cohort study.

Lancet Digit Health

September 2025

Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.

Background: New-onset atrial fibrillation, a condition associated with adverse outcomes in the short and long term, is common in patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). Identifying patients at high risk could inform trials of preventive interventions and help to target such interventions. We aimed to develop and externally validate a prediction model for new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients admitted to ICUs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The impact of off-label underdosing of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) on clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and stable coronary artery disease (CAD) remains unclear.

Methods: The EPIC-CAD trial (Edoxaban vs Edoxaban with antiPlatelet agent In patients with atrial fibrillation and Chronic stable Coronary Artery Disease) randomised patients with AF and stable CAD to receive either edoxaban monotherapy or dual antithrombotic therapy (edoxaban plus single antiplatelet agent). Off-label underdosing was defined as low-dose edoxaban (30 mg once daily) without standard criteria for dose reduction.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in adults, with incidence increasing with age. Cognitive impairment (CoI) and dementia share risk factors with AF. Meta-analyses indicate that AF increases the risk of CoI by 2.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Societal guidelines recommend vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for atrial fibrillation patients with recent biological valve implantation, but the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in this setting remain uncertain, especially in the early postoperative period. This substudy of the Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Study (LAAOS) III trial aimed to compare thromboembolic and bleeding outcomes in patients discharged on VKAs versus DOACs after bioprosthesis implantation or mitral valve repair.

Methods: A total of 2,645 patients were included, with 461 discharged on DOACs and 2184 on VKAs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF