Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a major complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA), often necessitating revision surgery. Debate persists regarding the optimal approach between single-stage and two-stage revision strategies.

Methods: This retrospective comparative study evaluated 60 patients (30 in each group) undergoing revision THA for chronic PJI. Patients were matched demographically, and outcomes were assessed over 24 months. Primary endpoints included infection recurrence and functional scores, including the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain.

Results: At 24-month follow-up, neither group demonstrated reinfection (0 % recurrence in both cohorts). VAS scores were slightly better in the single-stage group at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively (mean 1.9 vs 2.2 at 6 months, p = 0.24). The two-stage group had longer hospital stays and greater overall healthcare costs. Polymicrobial infections were more common in the two-stage cohort (20 % vs. 10 %), while 15 % of all cases were culture-negative. Staphylococcus aureus was identified as the primary pathogen in 46.7 % and 50.0 % of the respective groups. At 24 months, the Harris Hip Score averaged 85.4 ± 6.2 for single-stage compared to 83.3 ± 7.1 for two-stage revisions.

Conclusion: Both revision strategies are viable for managing chronic PJI, with comparable reinfection rates. However, single-stage revision may offer faster pain relief and reduced resource utilization. Clinical decision-making should consider factors such as infection type, organism profile, patient comorbidities, and surgical expertise.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12181032PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2025.103079DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hip arthroplasty
8
revision strategies
8
chronic pji
8
revision
6
infection
4
infection management
4
management hip
4
arthroplasty comparative
4
comparative insights
4
insights revision
4

Similar Publications

Background And Objective: With obese individuals experiencing osteoarthritis (OA) at early stages of life, hip resurfacing (HR) has emerged as an alternative to arthroplasty. The purpose is to conduct a short-term analysis on patients with obesity who underwent primary HR for OA compared to a benchmark control group of non-obese patients.

Materials And Methods: Patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2 who underwent HR from 2010 to 2021 were eligible for inclusion.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Individuals who have had total joint arthroplasty (TJA) are subject to lifelong exposure to metal-based implants. The relationship between chronic exposure to metal-based implants and systemic effects on the brain remains unclear. We aimed to determine the association between TJA and the subsequent long-term risk of dementia.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) with third-generation alumina ceramic heads on highly cross-linked polyethylene liners (HXLPE) has demonstrated excellent outcomes in young patients. However, concerns of ceramic head fracture, squeaking, stripe wear, and limited sizing led to the development of a fourth-generation ceramic head. The purpose of our study was to report on survivorship, wear characteristics, and patient-reported outcomes of THA with a fourth-generation 32-mm ceramic femoral head and HXLPE liner in patients 50 years or younger at 10-year minimum follow-up.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A 2-year minimum follow-up period has generally been preferred in orthopaedic studies. This minimum standard aids comparisons across the literature and helps to ensure methodological rigor. However, in some situations these minimum durations are not required to answer specific research questions and strictly enforcing these requirements poses unnecessary barriers to research by adding cost and complexity, increasing the risk of loss to follow-up, and potentially restricting early dissemination of clinically important findings.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is the standard surgical treatment for end-stage hip osteoarthritis, with its success dependent on precise preoperative planning, which, in turn, relies on accurate three-dimensional segmentation and reconstruction of the periarticular bone of the hip joint. However, patients with hip osteoarthritis often exhibit pathological characteristics, such as joint space narrowing, femoroacetabular impingement, osteophyte formation, and joint deformity. These changes present significant challenges for traditional manual or semi-automatic segmentation methods.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF