Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Intraoperative bleeding is a serious complication of spinal tumor surgery. Preoperative identification of patients at high risk of intraoperative blood transfusion (IBT) and intraoperative massive bleeding (IMB) before spinal tumor resection surgery is difficult but critical for surgical planning and blood management. This study aims to develop and validate delta radiomics prediction models for IBT and IMB in spinal tumor surgery.
Methods: Patients diagnosed with spinal tumors who underwent spinal tumor resection surgery were retrospectively recruited. CT, CTE, delta, and clinical models based on CT native phase, CT arterial phase images, and clinical factors were constructed using 10-fold cross-validation and logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM) in the training cohort. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were used to evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of these models.
Results: 231 patients were randomly divided into training (n = 161) and test (n = 70) cohorts, comprising 146 IBT and 85 no-IBT patients, 35 IMB and 196 no-IMB patients, respectively. The delta model performed best in predicting IBT and IMB risk, with better predictive ability than the clinical model (IDI = 0.11-0.13 for IBT, and IDI = 0.02-0.08 for IMB, p < 0.05, respectively). Calibration curves indicated that the predicted probabilities of IBT and IMB in the model did not differ significantly from the actual probabilities (p > 0.05).
Conclusion: The CT delta model we constructed may be a valuable tool to improve risk stratification before spinal tumor surgery, thus contributing to preoperative planning and improving patient prognosis.
Trial Registration: Retrospectively registered (M2020435).
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12183832 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-025-00900-1 | DOI Listing |