Robotic distal pancreatectomy using two-surgeon technique (TAKUMI-4): a technical note and initial outcomes.

Langenbecks Arch Surg

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, 700-8558, Okayama, Japan.

Published: June 2025


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: With the increasing use of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy, the use of robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) is also increasing worldwide. Standardized surgical protocols are essential for safe implementation of RDP. In this study, we present our surgical protocol and initial outcomes of RDP using “two-surgeon technique”.

Methods: Our standard RDP protocol included a two-surgeon technique for cooperation, rationality, and education. Short-term outcomes of RDP were also investigated. This retrospective study included 77 consecutive patients who underwent RDP at our institution between April 2021 and January 2025.

Results: The median operative time, estimated blood loss, and postoperative hospital stay were 214 min (interquartile range [IQR], 176–253), 10 mL (IQR, 0–50), and 9 days (IQR, 8–10), respectively. A textbook outcome was achieved in 84.4% of patients. Moreover, superior outcomes of RDP ( = 77) compared with those of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy ( = 62) were confirmed in this study.

Conclusion: Using the two-surgeon technique, we successfully standardized and introduced the RDP program. The two-surgeon technique can contribute to the safe introduction of RDP and expansion of the program.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12130140PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03751-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

distal pancreatectomy
16
two-surgeon technique
16
outcomes rdp
12
rdp
9
robotic distal
8
initial outcomes
8
pancreatectomy
4
two-surgeon
4
pancreatectomy two-surgeon
4
technique
4

Similar Publications

Prognostic factors for very early recurrence after neoadjuvant treatment and curative resection in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Surgery

September 2025

Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heide

Introduction: Very early recurrence in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma has been defined as recurrence ≤3 months after resection. Besides others, neoadjuvant treatment is delivered based on the assumption of preoperative eradication of micrometastasis as well as local downstaging. Prognostic factors of very early recurrence after neoadjuvant treatment remain largely unexplored.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), which is a highly aggressive tumor with a high mortality rate. Surgical resection remains the only potentially curative treatment. Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP), including laparoscopic and robotic approaches, has gained popularity, although the evidence of its efficacy is limited.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

[Is splenectomy necessary during distal pancreatectomy for a non-functional pNET?].

Chirurgie (Heidelb)

September 2025

Klinik für Visceral‑, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35043, Marburg, Deutschland.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background/ Aim: Total pancreatectomy (TP) is an uncommon type of pancreatic resection, even at high-volume centers. The indications of a TP are not fully defined, and the outcomes are controversial. The study aims to assess the frequency of use, indications, and early outcomes of TP in a contemporary consecutive series of 36 patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) enables posterior dissection along Gerota's fascia, contributing to improved R0 resection rates, lymphadenectomy, and overall survival (OS) in pancreatic body and tail cancers. Although a posterior margin ≥ 1000 μm has been associated with better prognosis, its relative impact compared with Gerota's fascia resection remains unclear. This study evaluated whether securing a posterior margin ≥ 1000 μm improves outcomes in patients undergoing Gerota's fascia resection for pancreatic body and tail cancer.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF