Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background/aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of serum pepsinogen (sPG) tests for gastritis, gastric adenoma (GA), and gastric cancer (GC) using the enzyme‑linked immunosorbent assay-based GastroPanel kit and to investigate the correlation between Gastro-Panel- and Latex-enhanced Turbidimetric Immunoassay (L-TIA)-derived sPG results.

Methods: sPG I and II levels and PG I/II ratios were measured using both kits in 2,204 participants, including 1,109 controls, 316 GA, and 779 GC patients.

Results: The GastroPanel- and L-TIA-derived sPG results showed high concordance. An sPG I concentration of 70 ng/mL and a PG I/II ratio of 3 measured with the L-TIA kit corresponded to 100 ng/mL and 5.3 with the GastroPanel kit. sPG I decreased in the GA and GC groups, whereas sPG II was lower in the GA group, but higher in the GC group than that in control group. The PG I/II ratios significantly decreased in the GA and GC groups, especially for the intestinal type. The sensitivity and specificity of PG I/II ratio ≤5.3 using the GastroPanel kit for the detection of GA or GC were 51%-59% and 61%-66%, respectively, which were slightly higher than 51%-58% and 58%-63% using the L-TIA kit. The group with a PG I/II ratio ≤5.3 and -negative status had the highest risk with an adjusted odds ratio of 3.36 for GA and 2.25 for GC, with more prominent increase in diffuse-type compared to intestinal-type.

Conclusions: The GastroPanel kit showed non-inferiority compared to the L-TIA kit.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl250055DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

gastropanel kit
16
i/ii ratio
12
l-tia kit
12
serum pepsinogen
8
gastric adenoma
8
adenoma gastric
8
gastric cancer
8
l-tia-derived spg
8
i/ii ratios
8
decreased groups
8

Similar Publications

Background/aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of serum pepsinogen (sPG) tests for gastritis, gastric adenoma (GA), and gastric cancer (GC) using the enzyme‑linked immunosorbent assay-based GastroPanel kit and to investigate the correlation between Gastro-Panel- and Latex-enhanced Turbidimetric Immunoassay (L-TIA)-derived sPG results.

Methods: sPG I and II levels and PG I/II ratios were measured using both kits in 2,204 participants, including 1,109 controls, 316 GA, and 779 GC patients.

Results: The GastroPanel- and L-TIA-derived sPG results showed high concordance.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) is the 17th most common cancer in the UK with a 5-year survival rate of 22%. GastroPanel (Biohit Oyj; Helsinki, Finland) is an ELISA kit that measures pepsinogen I (PGI); pepsinogen II (PGII); gastrin-17 (G-17); and Helicobacter pylori IgG antibodies (Hp IgG). PGI and the PGI/PGII ratio correlate inversely with the severity of chronic atrophic gastritis (AG).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Gastric cancer is one of the most common types of cancer worldwide. infection is clearly correlated with gastric carcinogenesis. Therefore, the use of a new non-invasive test, known as the GastroPanel test, can be very helpful to identify patients at a high risk, including those with atrophic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia, and dysplasia.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In Mongolia, gastric cancer morbidity and mortality are high, and more than 80 percent of cases are diagnosed at an advanced stage. This study aimed to evaluate pepsinogens (PGIs) and gastrin-17 (G-17) levels and to determine the diagnostic performances for gastric cancer and chronic atrophic gastritis among Mongolian individuals. We enrolled a total of 120 subjects, including gastric cancer (40), atrophic gastritis (40), and healthy control (40), matched by age (±2) and sex.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study identified key risk factors for gastric cancer in the Mongolian population, focusing on eating habits, smoking, and family history.
  • It involved 240 participants, including gastric cancer patients and healthy individuals, and utilized serum testing to measure certain biomarkers related to cancer risk.
  • The ABC(D) screening method effectively categorized high-risk individuals, with groups C and D showing a significantly higher incidence of gastric cancer compared to groups A and B.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF