Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Force-velocity (FV) relationships are used to evaluate athletes and individualise training in several tasks. In rowing, only one previous study has determined FV relationships using ergometers. This study aimed to develop a method to obtain FV relationships during on-water rowing, to assess their quality and inter-day reliability and to compare them with ergometer profiles. Fourteen participants performed 8 all-out starts in instrumented double scull boats with 3 scull lengths under two conditions: two active rowers or one active and one passive rower. The FV relationships, reconstructed with all the conditions, were linear with a high goodness of fit (median R: 0.96), covering 24.6 ± 5.0% of the velocity range. Ninety-five per cent confidence intervals for maximal force (F: 3.9 ± 0.5%) and maximal velocity (V: 6.2 ± 1.5%) were relatively narrow. The coefficient of variation for inter-day reliability was below 10% and intraclass correlation ranging from 0.69 for V to 0.96 for F. Correlations between on-water and ergometer rowing were significant for F ( = 0.70) and P ( = 0.82) but not for V ( = 0.11). F and V were significantly higher (23%) and lower (31%) on the ergometer, respectively. These results highlight a reliable linear FV relationship during on-water rowing to characterise rowing force production capacities, largely affected by on-water technical skills.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2025.2511765DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

on-water rowing
12
relationships on-water
8
inter-day reliability
8
rowing
6
relationships
5
on-water
5
force-velocity power-velocity
4
power-velocity relationships
4
rowing force-velocity
4
force-velocity relationships
4

Similar Publications

Drowning in research? A scoping review of the emergency response to medical emergencies occurring in water-based environments.

Australas Emerg Care

August 2025

Prehospital, Resuscitation and Emergency Care Research Unit (PRECRU), Curtin School of Nursing, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia; St John Western Australia, Belmont, WA, Australia.

Background: The water-based environment presents challenges to emergency services responding to medical emergencies. These include logistical difficulties, interagency response requirements, and knowledge of unique clinical conditions. Understanding which water-based incidents need emergency response, their locations, and resource needs is essential for preparing paramedics and other emergency service personnel.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Elite coach experiential knowledge may provide valuable insights into athlete preparation and monitoring practices that are otherwise difficult to establish objectively. Accordingly, we explored the perspectives of elite Australian rowing coaches in relation to (1) training philosophy, (2) training prescription methods, and (3) training monitoring and performance assessment. Ten experienced rowing coaches (experience range 15-51 years) were interviewed in a semi-structured format on the three topics established above.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Subjective and objective methods are commonly used to evaluate the load and physiological adaptations of athletes in training. However, there is a lack of data and their relationship concerning these tools in professional rowing training. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the subjective and objective training loads of male rowers during a mesocycle.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between on- and off-water performance tests in canoe slalom.

Methods: A total of 34 elite canoe slalom athletes, who competed in one of the following categories, namely K1 men (K1M,  = 9), K1 women (K1W,  = 8), C1 men (C1M,  = 9), or C1 women (C1W,  = 8), volunteered for the study. On-water testing consisted of two flat water tests: sprints with turns to both sides (SBS; 2 × 15 m shuttle sprints) and an all-out shuttle test (12 × 15 AOT; 12 × 15 m shuttle sprints).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF