Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Introduction: Up to 11% of patients are left with residual lung abnormalities following COVID-19 infection. It is unclear whether these changes resolve over time or progress to fibrosis. The airway microbiome is altered in interstitial lung disease, potentially contributing to pathogenesis and disease progression. We hypothesised that the airway microbiome in patients with post-COVID-19 residual lung abnormalities may be altered.

Methods: The POST COVID-19 interstitial lung DiseasE (POSTCODE) study recruited subjects with post-COVID-19 residual lung abnormalities for bronchoscopy. 16S ribosomal RNA gene amplicon sequencing was performed on DNA extracted from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and compared with that from patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis and control subjects.

Results: 28 subjects with post-COVID-19 residual lung abnormalities were recruited an average of 11 months after infection. No significant associations were found between the lower airway microbiome or bacterial burden and disease severity or trajectory. There was no difference in bacterial burden between post-COVID-19 patients and interstitial lung disease or control subjects. Furthermore, no differences in microbial composition were observed between these patients and those with fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis or controls. However, compared with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, there was an increased abundance of and higher α-diversity in subjects with post-COVID-19 residual lung abnormalities.

Conclusions: The microbiome and bacterial burden in the lower airways of subjects with post-COVID-19 residual lung abnormalities do not differ from those of controls. The microbiome differs from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. This, and the absence of associations between microbial features and disease severity or clinical outcomes, suggests that the microbiome is unlikely to contribute to residual lung abnormalities in patients recovering from COVID-19 infection.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12107383PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00826-2024DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

residual lung
32
lung abnormalities
28
post-covid-19 residual
24
idiopathic pulmonary
16
pulmonary fibrosis
16
subjects post-covid-19
16
airway microbiome
12
interstitial lung
12
lung disease
12
bacterial burden
12

Similar Publications

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) is standard of care in advanced diffuse pleural mesothelioma (DPM), but its role in the perioperative management of DPM is unclear. In tandem, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) ultra-sensitive residual disease detection has shown promise in providing a molecular readout of ICB efficacy across resectable cancers. This phase 2 trial investigated neoadjuvant nivolumab and nivolumab/ipilimumab in resectable DPM along with tumor-informed liquid biopsy residual disease assessments.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose Of Review: Symptom relief is now recognized as the primary remit of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with stable coronary artery disease. The relationship between the nature of angina symptoms and the likelihood of successful symptom relief from PCI had not been systematically studied until recently.

Recent Findings: The ORBITA-2 symptom-stratified analysis found that while the severity and nature of symptoms were poorly associated with the severity of coronary disease, the nature of the symptoms powerfully predicted the efficacy of PCI in relieving angina.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Robot-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled, non-inferiority clinical trial.

J Geriatr Cardiol

August 2025

Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Institute of Heart Lung and Blood Vessel Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine of Coronary Atherosclerotic Disease, Clinical Center for Coronary Heart Disease, Capital Medical University, Beijing,

Objective: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention (R-PCI) compared to traditional manual percutaneous coronary intervention (M-PCI).

Methods: This prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled, non-inferior clinical trial enrolled patients with coronary heart disease who met the inclusion criteria and had indications for elective percutaneous coronary intervention. Participants were randomly assigned to either the R-PCI group or the M-PCI group.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF