98%
921
2 minutes
20
Semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist, has emerged as an important therapeutic option for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), available in both oral and subcutaneous formulations. While subcutaneous semaglutide has been available since 2017, oral semaglutide (approved in 2019) represents the first oral GLP-1 receptor agonist. This meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of oral versus subcutaneous semaglutide in patients with T2DM. We conducted a systematic literature search across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from inception to March 15, 2025. Four studies (one randomized controlled trial and three retrospective studies) with a total of 559 patients (257 receiving oral and 302 receiving subcutaneous semaglutide) met our inclusion criteria. The included studies were published from 2017 to 2024. All studies had a six-month follow-up duration. Outcomes included changes in HbA1c, body weight, and treatment discontinuation due to adverse effects. Pooled analysis indicated that subcutaneous semaglutide achieved significantly greater reductions in HbA1c compared to oral semaglutide (SMD: 0.21, 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.38) with low heterogeneity (I-square: 22%). For body weight reduction, subcutaneous semaglutide showed greater effectiveness, though the difference was not statistically significant (SMD: 0.12, 95% CI: -0.27 to 0.52) with high heterogeneity (I-square: 81%). Notably, patients receiving oral semaglutide had a significantly higher risk of treatment discontinuation due to side effects (RR: 1.79, 95% CI: 1.13 to 2.83) with no heterogeneity (I-square: 0%). While both formulations demonstrated clinical benefits, subcutaneous semaglutide appears to offer superior glycemic control with fewer treatment-limiting adverse effects. These findings likely reflect the differences in bioavailability and pharmacokinetics between the two formulations. However, the choice between formulations should consider individual patient factors, including treatment adherence, preference for injection versus oral administration, and specific comorbidities. Future studies should investigate whether modified dosing protocols could improve the tolerability of oral semaglutide while maintaining efficacy.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12085783 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.82497 | DOI Listing |
JAMA Psychiatry
September 2025
Department of Endocrinology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Importance: Patients with schizophrenia have reduced life expectancy due to cardiovascular disease and obesity-related type 2 diabetes, exacerbated by second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) medication. Existing interventions have shown limited effect.
Objectives: To assess the effect of the once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist semaglutide in SGA-treated adults (aged 18-60 years) with schizophrenia, prediabetes (glycosylated hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c], 5.
Diabetes Obes Metab
August 2025
Faculty of Medicine, Pelita Harapan University, Tangerang, Indonesia.
Aims: The rising prevalence of overweight and obesity among Asian populations poses a critical public health concern. Semaglutide 2.4 mg, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, has demonstrated promising weight-reduction effects in global populations, but its efficacy and safety profile in Asians remain less comprehensively examined.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRadiology
August 2025
Department of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin 2nd Rd, Shanghai 200025, China.
Background Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) and glucagon receptor (GCGR) dual agonist, along with GLP-1R monoagonist, show promise in treating metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Liver fat and iron content are important surrogate markers for disease assessment. However, it remains unclear whether dual agonists provide superior therapeutic benefit over monoagonists for hepatic fat and iron regulation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLancet Diabetes Endocrinol
August 2025
Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Background: Consistent with WHO recommendations, obesity is defined as BMI ≥25 kg/m in many Asian populations because of increased health risks at lower BMIs than in other populations. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 2·4 mg versus placebo in an Asian population with BMI ≥25 kg/m, together with lifestyle interventions.
Methods: STEP 11 was a 44-week, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial conducted at 12 clinical sites in South Korea and Thailand.
Adv Nutr
August 2025
Department of Nutrition, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, United States. Electronic address:
Injectable antiobesity medications (AOMs), including liraglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide, have demonstrated significant efficacy in promoting weight loss and improving glycemic control. However, the extent to which diet and food intake and related eating behaviors are assessed or reported in clinical trials of these agents remains unclear. This scoping review aimed to evaluate the presence and quality of dietary data, nutritional counseling, and related behavioral measures in randomized controlled trials of subcutaneous AOMs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF