Second-line strategies after anti-TNF failure in chronically active, moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis: a retrospective, multicentre cohort study.

Background: Many ulcerative colitis (UC) patients require the use of second-line agents after the failure of anti-TNF therapy.

Research Design And Methods: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study including 683 chronically active, moderate-to-severe UC patients who failed first-line anti-TNFs. The rate of treatment persistence and colectomy-free survival was assessed up to 3 years after the initiation of second-line therapy. Predictors for colectomy and persistence were investigated.

Results: After the failure of the first-line anti-TNF, ustekinumab had superior persistence and colectomy-free survival rates compared to tofacitinib ( = 0.05;  = 0.001) and vedolizumab ( = 0.02;  = 0.05), but significant difference was only found in persistence rates in comparison with anti-TNFs ( < 0.001). Regardless of the number of prior anti-TNFs, significantly higher persistence ( = 0.05) and colectomy-free survival rates ( = 0.01) were observed over 2 years with ustekinumab than with vedolizumab or tofacitinib, whereas ustekinumab's superiority over tofacitinib seemed to disappear by the third year. Hypoalbuminaemia ( = 0.002) and shorter disease duration at second-line initiation ( = 0.03) increased, while concomitant immunomodulators ( = 0.05) reduced the risk for colectomy. Shorter disease duration ( = 0.01) and primary non-response to the previously used anti-TNF ( < 0.001) negatively influenced persistence with second-line non-TNF-targeted agents.

Conclusion: After first-line anti-TNF failure, switching to a non-anti-TNF agent is worth considering in moderate-to-severe UC.