98%
921
2 minutes
20
Electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony (MD) underlies left ventricular (LV) contractile dysfunction in patients with heart failure (HF) and left bundle branch block (LBBB). In some cases, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) almost completely reverses LV contractile dysfunction. The LBBB electrocardiographic Strauss criteria and MD assessment were proposed to improve CRT response. However, using these techniques separately does not improve LV contraction in 20-40% of patients after CRT device implantation. We aimed to evaluate whether the combined use of electrocardiography (ECG), speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) and cardiac scintigraphy could improve the prognosis of CRT super-response in patients with HF and Strauss LBBB criteria during a 6-month follow-up period. The study prospectively included patients with HF, classified as New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class (FC) II-III in sinus rhythm with Strauss LBBB criteria and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Before and 6 months after CRT device implantation, ECG, STE and cardiac scintigraphy were performed. The study's primary endpoint was the NYHA class improvement ≥ 1 and left ventricle end systolic volume decrease > 30% or LVEF improvement > 15% after 6 months of CRT. Based on collected data, we developed a prognostic model regarding the CRT super-response. Out of 54 (100.0%) patients, 39 (72.2%) had a CRT super-response. Patients with CRT super-response were likelier to have a greater S wave amplitude in V lead ( = 0.004), higher rates of global longitudinal strain (GLS) ( = 0.001) and interventricular delay (IVD) ( = 0.005). Only three indicators (S wave amplitude in V lead, GLS and IVD) were independently associated with CRT super-response in univariable and multivariable logistic regression. We created a prognostic model based on the logistic equation and calculated a cut-off value (>0.73). The resulting ROC curve revealed a discriminative ability with an AUC of 0.957 (sensitivity 87.2%; specificity 100.0%). The electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony assessment using ECG, STE and cardiac scintigraphy is useful in the prediction of CRT super-response in patients with HF and Strauss LBBB criteria during a 6-month follow-up period. Our prognostic model can identify patients who are super-responders to CRT.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12028675 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life15040605 | DOI Listing |
JACC Adv
August 2025
University Heart Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Center for Translational and Experimental Cardiology (CTEC), Department of Cardiology, Zurich University Hospital, University of Zurich, Schlieren, Switzerland; Division of Cardiology, Zurich Regional Health Center Wetzikon, Z
Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces morbidity and mortality in selected heart failure patients. A distinct subpopulation (so-called "nonprogressors") of patients shows neither amelioration nor worsening of echocardiographic parameters after CRT implantation.
Objectives: The authors sought to investigate the long-term outcomes and prognosis of a distinct subpopulation of heart failure patients termed "nonprogressors," after CRT implantation.
Diagnostics (Basel)
April 2025
Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases Timisoara, 300310 Timisoara, Romania.
: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with fusion pacing ("LV only"), also known as fusion-CRT (f-CRT), represents a feasible alternative to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing (BiVP), not only in cases of BiVP failure, but also as a primary therapy option due to its potential benefits over traditional CRT. Fusion pacing may be particularly beneficial in selected patients and understanding the structural and functional differences between responders could guide future optimization strategies. This study provides a descriptive comparison between super-responders (SRs) and non-super-responders (NSRs) undergoing fusion-CRT.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLife (Basel)
April 2025
Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Kievskaya St., 111a, Tomsk 634012, Russia.
Electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony (MD) underlies left ventricular (LV) contractile dysfunction in patients with heart failure (HF) and left bundle branch block (LBBB). In some cases, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) almost completely reverses LV contractile dysfunction. The LBBB electrocardiographic Strauss criteria and MD assessment were proposed to improve CRT response.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Cardiovasc Disord
March 2025
Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, No. 222. Zhongshan Road, Dalian, Liaoning Province, China.
Objective: This study aims to explore the feasibility, safety, and clinical performance of conduction system pacing (CSP) in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and varying left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) values.
Methods: We consecutively enrolled all patients with LVEF ≤ 35% and LBBB who met the criteria for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and underwent CSP from January 2018 to December 2021. We compared the differences in improvements in cardiac performance after CSP between patients with LVEF < 25% and those with LVEF between 25 to 35%.
Front Cardiovasc Med
January 2025
Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Aims: This retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate the efficacy of dual-chamber left Bundle branch pacing (LBBP) as an alternative therapy for heart failure patients with complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB) and indications for defibrillator with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT-D).
Methods: 34 patients met inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study. These criteria included a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of lower than 35%, a New York Heart Association functional class of II-IV, CLBBB meeting Strauss's criteria, intraventricular dyssynchrony, and confirmed correction of CLBBB during LBBP.