Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objective: To identify imaging biomarkers of primary tumors and lymph nodes in patients with stage III-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and assess their predictive ability for treatment response (response vs. non-response) to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) after 6 months.
Methods: Retrospective analysis of 83 NSCLC patients treated with ICIs. Quantitative imaging features of the maximum primary lung tumors and lymph nodes on contrast-enhanced CT imaging were extracted at baseline (time point 0, TP0) and after 2-3 cycles of immunotherapy (time point 1, TP1). Delta-radiomics features (delta-RFs) were defined as the net changes in radiomics features (RFs) between TP0 and TP1. Interobserver interclass coefficient (ICC) and Pearson correlation analyses were applied for feature selection, and logistic regression (LR) was used to build a model for predicting treatment response.
Results: Four and five important delta-RFs were selected to construct the nodal and tumor models, respectively. Δ Tumor diameter was used for constructing the clinical prediction model. The predictive efficacy of the nodal model for the treatment response status was higher than that of the tumor and clinical models. In the training set, the AUC values for the three models were 0.96 (95% CI = 0.90-1.00), 0.86 (95% CI = 0.76-0.95), and 0.82 (95% CI = 0.71-0.93), respectively. In the validation set, the AUC values were 0.94 (95% CI = 0.85-1.00), 0.77 (95% CI = 0.56-0.98), and 0.74 (95% CI = 0.48-1.00), respectively.
Conclusion: The nodal model based on delta-RFs performed well in distinguishing responders from non-responders and could identify patients more likely to benefit from immunotherapy. Finally, the nodal model exhibited a higher classification performance than the tumor model.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12003267 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1541376 | DOI Listing |