98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Fospropofol disodium is comparable to propofol in maintaining mild-to-moderate sedation for mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care unit (ICU). However, its efficacy for deep sedation remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted a randomized-controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of fospropofol disodium with propofol for deep sedation of mechanically ventilated patients in ICU.
Methods: In this randomized pilot study, critically ill adult patients requiring deep sedation were randomized to receive fospropofol disodium or propofol. The study drug was titrated to maintain a Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale score (RASS) of-5 or-4. Narcotrend Index (NI) value was monitored during the whole study period. The primary outcome was the percentage of time in the target sedation range without rescue sedation. The secondary outcomes were successful extubation, ventilator-free days at day 7, ventilator-free days at day 28, 28-day all-cause mortality and adverse events.
Results: Thirty patients were included in each group. The fospropofol disodium infusion lasted for 47.50 (IQR 31.75 to 48.00) hours at a dose of 8.19 ± 2.36 mg/kg/h, while propofol infusion for 48.00 (IQR 30.88 to 48.00) hours at 2.73 ± 0.83 mg/kg/h. The proportion of time within the target RASS range without rescue sedation was 96.78%±0.07% in the fospropofol group and 98.43%±0.04% in the propofol group (p = 0.273). A total of 39 patients experienced adverse events, with 19 in the fospropofol group and 20 in the propofol group. The most common adverse event was hypotension, with 18 patients (60.0%) in each group. No significant differences were observed in successful extubation, ventilator-free days at day 7, ventilator-free days at day 28, or 28-day all-cause mortality.
Conclusions: In this open-label trial, fospropofol disodium achieved deep sedation at a rate comparable to propofol. For mechanically ventilated ICU patients, fospropofol disodium may offer a safe and effective sedation option. Larger multicenter trials are needed to confirm these findings.
Trial Registration: The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov on May 12, 2023, with the identifer NCT05870514.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11984281 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03025-x | DOI Listing |
J Perianesth Nurs
July 2025
Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi, China. Electronic address:
Purpose: The objective of this study is to ascertain the 95% effective dose (ED95) of fospropofol disodium for injection (fospropofol) combined with sufentanil for the attenuation of cardiovascular reactions to endotracheal intubation, to determine the optimal dosage of fospropofol disodium for clinical safe medication use in different populations.
Design: This study employed a biased coin design (BCD)-based up-and-down sequential allocation trial method.
Methods: Eighty surgical patients who received fospropofol disodium combined with sufentanil for general anesthesia induction at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University between March and September 2023 were enrolled.
Saudi J Anaesth
June 2025
Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Fospropofol is a water-soluble prodrug of propofol that has gained increasing attention in the field of anesthesia due to its gentle modulation of cerebral blood flow and metabolism. This review summarizes the pharmacological mechanisms by which fospropofol regulates cerebral hemodynamics, including direct effects on vascular smooth muscle and indirect modulation via suppression of neural metabolic activity. The article also discusses its ability to reduce cerebral metabolic rate, inhibit neuronal excitability, and modulate energy balance, all of which contribute to its potential neuroprotective properties, particularly in ischemia-reperfusion injury.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDrug Des Devel Ther
July 2025
Anesthesia and Surgery Center of West China Xiamen Hospital, Sichuan University, Xiamen, People's Republic of China.
Fospropofol disodium (FD) is a safe and effective alternative to propofol, as it avoids injection pain, severe hypotension, significant respiratory depression, and allergic reactions during intravenous anesthesia induction. FD, the water-soluble prodrug of propofol, was initially developed by Eisai in Japan and was approved by the FDA for marketing in the United States in 2008. However, due to formaldehyde accumulation, safety concerns in outpatient settings, and the requirement for administration by anesthesiologists, the product had poor sales and was withdrawn in 2012.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDrug Des Devel Ther
April 2025
Graduate School of Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, People's Republic of China.
Purpose: Propofol is widely used for general anesthesia in elderly patients. Fospropofol disodium, a precursor of propofol, may reduce the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). However, the effects of these two drugs on patients' postoperative recovery quality are unclear.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Anesthesiol
April 2025
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Background: Fospropofol disodium is comparable to propofol in maintaining mild-to-moderate sedation for mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care unit (ICU). However, its efficacy for deep sedation remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted a randomized-controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of fospropofol disodium with propofol for deep sedation of mechanically ventilated patients in ICU.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF