Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: Lynch syndrome (LS) is a cancer predisposition syndrome caused by a germline loss-of-function mutation in a mismatch repair (MMR) gene. While sarcomas are not classically considered LS cancers, we investigated the MMR status and clinical features of sarcomas in LS patients to help inform optimal treatment strategies.

Methods: A prospectively maintained institutional clinical cancer genetics database was queried for LS patients (defined by pathogenic germline mutation in a MMR gene) with a documented diagnosis of sarcoma between 1998-2022. Tumor MMR status was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for MMR proteins and secondarily by PCR assay if IHC was normal or intact.

Results: Among the 30 LS patients with sarcoma, germline mutations were most common in (50%). The most common sarcoma subtypes were undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (40%) and leiomyosarcoma (27%). Median age at diagnosis was 49.2 years (interquartile range 40.4-62.4). 90% presented with localized disease, and 10% presented with synchronous metastatic disease. Among 10 patients with tissue available for biomarker determination, dMMR was confirmed in 4 (40%), while the remaining (60%) were pMMR. Three patients received immunotherapy. Two of these had confirmed dMMR tumor status: one demonstrated a sustained complete response on pembrolizumab monotherapy for 44 months; the other had a partial response on ipilimumab and nivolumab for 31 months but died from an unrelated cause. In the entire cohort of 30 patients at a median follow-up time of 68.2 months since sarcoma diagnosis (interquartile range 29.0-151.5 months), median overall survival and progression-free survival have not been reached.

Conclusion: While rare, sarcoma can be encountered in patients with LS, particularly those with germline mutation. LS-associated sarcomas occur significantly earlier, carry a favorable outcome, and demonstrate the potential for durable response with immunotherapy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11967435PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soi.2024.100091DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mismatch repair
8
mmr gene
8
mmr status
8
germline mutation
8
interquartile range
8
sarcoma
7
patients
7
mmr
5
dna mismatch
4
repair deficiency
4

Similar Publications

Background: Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. Genetic variants in mismatch repair (MMR) genes, such as MutS homolog 2 (MSH2), MutS homolog 6 (MSH6) and MutL homolog 1 (MLH1), may influence individual susceptibility and clinical outcomes in LC.

Objective: This study investigated the associations of genetic polymorphisms in MSH2, MSH6, and MLH1 with susceptibility and survival outcomes in lung cancer patients in the Guangxi Zhuang population.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can re-active the immune response and induce a complete response in mismatch repair-deficient and microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) colorectal cancer (CRC). However, most CRCs exhibit proficient mismatch repair and microsatellite stable (pMMR/MSS) phenotypes with limited immunotherapy response because of sparse intratumoral CD8 T-lymphocyte infiltration. Cellular senescence has been reported to involve immune cell infiltration through a senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

To investigate the clinicopathological features of SMARCA4-deficient uterine sarcoma. Five cases of SMARCA4-deficient uterine sarcoma at the Department of Pathology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from 2018 to 2024 were collected. The morphological and immunohistochemical features were observed and analyzed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A subset of rectal cancer (RC), <5%, exhibits mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR); the remaining are classified as proficient (pMMR). Reported evidence on differences between dMMR and pMMR RC is limited. In this nationwide Dutch study, we compared patients with dMMR and pMMR stage II/III RC based on patient and tumor characteristics, treatment patterns, and associated outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF