98%
921
2 minutes
20
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2025.03.001 | DOI Listing |
Trends Cogn Sci
September 2025
Social Computation and Representation Lab, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Centre for AI and Machine Learning, ECU, Perth, Australia. Electronic address:
J Med Ethics
September 2025
Interdisciplinary Centre for Ethics, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
We respond to Gillon's critique of our data-driven analysis of the history of (), in which we used a topic model to trace intellectual trends in the journal's first 50 years. Gillon, drawing on his personal memories as 's second (and longest serving) editor, challenges several of our findings, particularly those concerning the prominence and classification of topics such as In this reply, we clarify misunderstandings that led to part of his criticisms of our method. At the same time, we also briefly discuss some nuances of topic modelling, in particular, its reliance on simplified representations of text, sensitivity to modeling choices and topic interpretations.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPediatr Radiol
August 2025
Imaging department, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
September 2025
Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.
J Intensive Care Med
August 2025
Department of Radiology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.