Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes at short-term follow-up following suture button fixation for the management of ligamentous Lisfranc injuries.

Aim: To assess the effectiveness of suture button fixation in managing ligamentous Lisfranc injuries through a systematic evaluation of short-term clinical and radiological outcomes.

Methods: During March 2024, the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases were systematically reviewed to identify clinical studies examining outcomes following suture button fixation for the management of ligamentous Lisfranc injuries. Data regarding patient demographics, pathological characteristics, subjective clinical outcomes, radiological outcomes, complications, and failure rates were extracted and analyzed.

Results: Eight studies were included. In total, 94 patients (94 feet) underwent suture button fixation for the management of ligamentous Lisfranc injuries at a weighted mean follow-up of 27.2 ± 10.2 months. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score improved from a weighted mean pre-operative score of 39.2 ± 11.8 preoperatively to a post-operative score of 82.8 ± 5.4. The weighted mean visual analogue scale score improved from a weighted mean pre-operative score of 7.7 ± 0.6 preoperatively to a post-operative score of 2.0 ± 0.4. In total, 100% of patients returned to sport at a mean time of 16.8 weeks. The complication rate was 5%, the most common complication of which was residual midfoot stiffness (3.0%). No failures nor secondary surgical procedures were recorded.

Conclusion: This systematic review demonstrated that suture button fixation for ligamentous Lisfranc injuries produced improved clinical outcomes at short-term follow-up. In addition, there was an excellent return-to-sport rate (100%) at a weighted mean time of 16.8 weeks. This review highlights that suture button fixation is a potent surgical treatment strategy for ligamentous Lisfranc injuries; however, caution should be taken when evaluating this data in light of the lack of high quality, comparative studies, and short-term follow-up.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11924019PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v16.i3.97830DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

suture button
28
button fixation
28
ligamentous lisfranc
28
lisfranc injuries
24
systematic review
12
short-term follow-up
12
fixation management
12
management ligamentous
12
fixation ligamentous
8
injuries systematic
8

Similar Publications

Purpose: To conduct a meta-analysis of clinical studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of arthroscopic and open surgery for the treatment of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation using a suture button.

Methods: The review process was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Two independent reviewers conducted the literature searches based on preferred reporting items from systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Use of bony landmarks for more accurate tibiofibular syndesmotic fixation: Validity and safety analysis of the angle bisector method.

Foot Ankle Surg

August 2025

Foot & Ankle Research and Innovation Lab (FARIL), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Foot and Ankle Division, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Newton Wellesley Hospital, Harvard Medic

Background And Aims: The Angle Bisector Method uses the cortices of the tibia and fibula as reference points and suggests a syndesmotic fixation trajectory through the bisector of the angle formed by two lines tangent to the anterior and posterior aspects of the tibia and fibula. This study aimed to assess whether the Angle Bisector Method can provide a patient- and level-specific syndesmotic fixation angle that is reproducible, safe, and independent of the surgeon in a cadaveric setting.

Methods: Twelve matched above-knee leg specimens from six cadavers, underwent syndesmotic fixation (using either screws or suture-buttons) at two levels-2 cm and 3.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Acute unstable syndesmosis injuries require accurate reduction and stable fixation to improve short-term and long-term outcomes. Several different fixation methods have been established for acute syndesmosis injuries, each with pros and cons. Although some meta-analyses have reported better outcomes with suture-buttons than screws, the optimal fixation method remains uncertain because of heterogeneous study results and limited comparisons of emerging techniques.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Chronic thumb collateral ligament injuries in the nonarthritic joint continue to pose treatment challenges. When acutely injured, ulnar and radial collateral ligaments can be primarily repaired. In the chronic setting, the injured ligaments can be difficult to mobilize and are, oftentimes, attenuated, exhibiting poor soft tissue quality.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Reruptures and functional deficits can occur with conventional transosseous quadriceps tendon repair. Previous work has demonstrated the biomechanical superiority of adjustable transosseous metal cortical button fixation over conventional repair. Knotless all-suture anchor (ASA) buttons may provide a similar improvement but have not yet been investigated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF