98%
921
2 minutes
20
Introduction: Acute unstable syndesmosis injuries require accurate reduction and stable fixation to improve short-term and long-term outcomes. Several different fixation methods have been established for acute syndesmosis injuries, each with pros and cons. Although some meta-analyses have reported better outcomes with suture-buttons than screws, the optimal fixation method remains uncertain because of heterogeneous study results and limited comparisons of emerging techniques. This network meta-analysis combining randomised and observational studies aims to determine the optimal fixation method for acute syndesmosis injuries.
Methods And Analysis: Five electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data and Embase) will be comprehensively searched from their inception through 1 June 2025 for randomised and observational studies, published in English or Chinese, that compared two or more fixation methods for acute syndesmosis injuries. Inclusion and exclusion criteria will be used for selection based on patient, intervention, comparison, outcome and study standards. Risk of bias will be evaluated by the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool 2 and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale, respectively. Conventional pairwise meta-analyses with the DerSimonian-Laird random effects model will be conducted first, followed by network meta-analyses with a three-level Bayesian hierarchical model. The outcome measures include functional outcomes, radiological indicators and postoperative complications. Data analysis will be conducted using Review Manager 5.3 and R 4.1.2. Heterogeneity, transitivity and inconsistency tests, subgroup and sensitivity analyses and publication bias will also be assessed.
Ethics And Dissemination: No ethical approval is required because all the data will be collected from published research. The results of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.
Trial Registration Number: INPLASY202480027.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12366565 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092184 | DOI Listing |
BMJ Open
August 2025
Orthopedics Center of PLA, The 940th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force Army of PLA, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
Introduction: Acute unstable syndesmosis injuries require accurate reduction and stable fixation to improve short-term and long-term outcomes. Several different fixation methods have been established for acute syndesmosis injuries, each with pros and cons. Although some meta-analyses have reported better outcomes with suture-buttons than screws, the optimal fixation method remains uncertain because of heterogeneous study results and limited comparisons of emerging techniques.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSkeletal Radiol
July 2025
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Av. Albert Einstein, 627, 05652-901, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Most acute ankle sprains involve injuries to the lateral collateral ligaments, while a smaller proportion pertain to injuries of the deltoid ligament or the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis ligaments. Despite being less common, syndesmotic injuries can lead to persistent symptoms, extended recovery periods, and more intricate treatment protocols compared to lateral collateral ligament injuries. In the decision-making process for treating syndesmotic injuries, evaluating both ligament tears and the degree of joint instability is essential, as the latter determines whether a patient should be treated conservatively or surgically.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Sports Med
July 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Background: In athletes with an acute ligamentous ankle injury, cartilage and osteochondral lesions ([O]CLs) have been reported in 8% using 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Visualization of cartilage injuries improves with the use of higher field strengths.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOper Orthop Traumatol
June 2025
Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Muskuloskelettales Universitätszentrum, München (MUM), Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, Ziemssenstr. 5, 80336, München, Deutschland.
Objective: Identification and treatment of concomitant intra-articular pathologies, verification of syndesmotic instability, debridement of syndesmotic structures in chronic injuries, reduction, and retention of the fibula in the distal tibiofibular joint.
Indications: Acute and chronic two- or three-ligamentous syndesmotic ruptures in active patients.
Contraindications: Soft tissue injuries, general risk factors, e.
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol
June 2025
Department of Musculoskeletal Centre X-Ray, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Acute ankle sprain including distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury is the most common lower limb sports injury. In the athletic population, imaging with magnetic resonance imaging plays an important role in the grading of acute ankle sprain but crucially also in the detection of associated injuries, such as bone contusion, osteochondral lesions, fracture, and tendon injury. Accurate diagnosis in the acute phase of injury facilitates surgical decision making, appropriate rehabilitation, and prediction of return-to-play time.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF