A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Circulating Inflammation Biomarkers and the Risk of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Nested Case-Control Study in the Department of Defense Serum Repository. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: We previously identified associations of esophageal adenocarcinoma risk with four inflammation-related candidate biomarkers: TNF receptor 2 (TNFR2), IL17A, VEGFR3, and resistin.

Methods: We aimed to replicate these candidates and discover novel associations with additional proteins. We conducted a nested case-control study of men with prediagnostic biospecimens stored at the US Department of Defense Serum Repository, including 203 incident esophageal adenocarcinoma cases. Controls were matched to cases in a ∼2:1 ratio by date of birth, race, service branch, and blood draw date. Multiplex immunoassays (Olink/Proseek panels) measured 254 proteins detected in ≥10% of all samples. Multivariable-adjusted conditional logistic regression models calculated associations between biomarker quantiles and esophageal adenocarcinoma. P values (<0.05) were used to indicate the statistical significance of candidates, and FDR was applied to the additional proteins. ORs from the current analysis and those from previous studies were combined for the candidate markers using fixed-effects meta-analysis.

Results: Among the four candidates, the highest category of TNFR2 was associated with significantly increased esophageal adenocarcinoma risk (ORQ4 vs. Q1 = 1.87; 95% confidence interval: 1.02-3.42). In the meta-analysis, associations with esophageal adenocarcinoma were positive for TNFR2 (meta-analyzed ORhighest-vs.-lowest = 2.04; 1.12-2.95) and inverse for IL17A (meta-analyzed ORhighest-vs.-lowest = 0.53; 0.26-0.80). Of the additional 250 proteins, 45 were associated with esophageal adenocarcinoma risk and 6 (monocyte chemotactic protein 3, IL6, TNFR1, hepatocyte growth factor, TFF3, and FURIN) remained significant after FDR correction.

Conclusions: We confirmed associations of TNFR2 and IL17A with esophageal adenocarcinoma risk. Additionally, our study expands the range of proteins associated with esophageal adenocarcinoma development.

Impact: This is the largest assessment to discover novel associations of inflammation-related proteins with esophageal adenocarcinoma to date.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12048206PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1544DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

esophageal adenocarcinoma
16
nested case-control
8
case-control study
8
department defense
8
defense serum
8
serum repository
8
circulating inflammation
4
inflammation biomarkers
4
biomarkers risk
4
esophageal
4

Similar Publications