A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Uncovering key sources of regional ozone simulation biases using machine learning and SHAP analysis. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Atmospheric chemical transport models (CTMs) are widely used in air quality management, but still have large biases in simulations. Accurately and efficiently identifying key sources of simulation biases is crucial for model improvement. However, traditional approaches, such as sensitivity and uncertainty analyses, are computationally intensive and inefficient, as they require numerous model runs. In this study, we explored the use of machine learning, specifically XGBoost combined with SHAP analysis, as an efficient diagnostic tool for analyzing simulation biases, focusing on ozone modeling in Guangdong Province as a case study. We used the bias of model inputs as features and excluded a dataset that was more susceptible to observational uncertainties to better target bias sources. Results reveal that biases in concentrations of NO, NO and PM, temperature and biogenic emissions are important sources that lead to O simulation biases. Notably, NO emissions were identified as the primary cause, particularly in VOC-limited regimes during autumn and winter. Additionally, underestimated NO emissions caused the model to misrepresent the NO-O relationship, leading to an underestimation of the spatial extent of VOC-limited regimes in the PRD. This study demonstrates that enhancing NO emission estimates reduces O simulation biases in the PRD by 34% and enhances the representation of the NO-O relationship.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2025.126012DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

simulation biases
20
key sources
8
machine learning
8
shap analysis
8
voc-limited regimes
8
no-o relationship
8
biases
7
simulation
5
uncovering key
4
sources
4

Similar Publications