Strategic and Performance Planning in US Local Health Departments: A Comparative Analysis of Strategic, Community Health Improvement, and Quality Improvement Plans.

J Public Health Manag Pract

Author Affiliations: Sinai Health System, Sinai Urban Health Institute, Chicago, Illinois (Mss Jacobs and Smart, Dr Benjamins, and Mr Valencia); and National Association of County and City Health Officials, Washington, District of Columbia (Mss Clayton and Edmiston, Drs Patel and McCall, and Ms Lee)

Published: July 2025


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Context: Local health departments (LHDs) are a critical component of the US public health infrastructure. To guide their work and evaluate progress, LHDs develop and maintain a range of planning documents, including strategic plans (SPs), community health improvement plans (CHIPs), and quality improvement plans (QIPs).

Objective: The goal of this study was to provide information on current LHD practices related to strategic planning and performance improvement.

Design: The study used an environmental scan and document analysis of a sample of 93 plans from 31 LHDs to explore commonalities and differences within the strategies, goals, and priorities of SPs, CHIPs, and QIPs. Framework analysis was used, involving initial document review, development of a coding framework, and applying this framework to all documents iteratively. To ensure reliability, 19% of documents were double-coded, with discrepancies resolved through team discussions.

Results: Of the 31 LHDs included in this analysis, most were urban (89.7%) and medium-sized (64.5%), with a large percentage from the Midwest (41.9%). The analysis revealed that most LHDs used established frameworks to develop plans and identify priority areas. Frequently listed priority areas included behavioral health, social determinants of health, access to care, chronic disease, and nutrition and physical activity. Frequently listed strategies to improve priority areas included building collaborations and partnerships, advocating for policy change, increasing access to services and resources, and increasing awareness of issues. While CHIPs frequently incorporated social determinants of health as part of a guiding framework, QIPs focused on fostering continuous quality improvement. Differences were documented based on jurisdiction size, degree of rurality, and region.

Conclusions: The study identified a widespread commitment to develop plans using established frameworks, community engagement, and data-driven decision-making, while also highlighting the diverse needs and capacities of LHDs in addressing public health challenges.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000002152DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

quality improvement
12
improvement plans
12
priority areas
12
health
9
local health
8
health departments
8
community health
8
health improvement
8
public health
8
established frameworks
8

Similar Publications

Evidence-based practices (EBPs) are most effective when they are delivered with a high degree of fidelity, or as they are intended to be delivered. Because clinicians often deviate from fidelity, it is important to monitor EBP fidelity over time to guide corrective actions. However, little is known about current fidelity monitoring practices in community behavioral health care.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: There is increasing interest in using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to assess quality of life (QoL) following hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). However, there is limited consensus on how such data should be collected within HCT services. This survey study investigated health professionals (HCPs) views towards QoL data collection and factors affecting the use of PROMs within HCT centres in the UK.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Patients with acquired and congenital heart disease (CHD) are at higher risk of hospitalization. Despite quality improvement (QI) initiatives, many patients experience readmission soon after discharge. We aimed to identify risk factors for 30-day readmission and hypothesized that direct discharge from the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) is associated with an increased readmission rate.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Clinical trials typically report average health status outcomes by treatment at single points in time, as opposed to participants' trajectories (or journeys) over time. Although ISCHEMIA (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches) demonstrated better mean health status at discrete times with an invasive treatment among those with baseline angina, the patterns of individual participants' angina over time are unknown.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to identify patterns of individual participants' angina over time after invasive or conservative management strategies for chronic coronary disease.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF