Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: The aim of our study was to develop and evaluate a deep learning model (BiStageNet) for automatic detection of dens evaginatus (DE) premolars on orthodontic intraoral photographs. Additionally, based on the training results, we developed a DE detection platform for orthodontic clinical applications.
Methods: We manually selected the premolar areas for automatic premolar recognition training using a dataset of 1,400 high-quality intraoral photographs. Next, we labeled each premolar for DE detection training using a dataset of 2,128 images. We introduced the Dice coefficient, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, ROC curve as well as areas under the ROC curve to evaluate the learning results of our model. Finally, we constructed an automatic DE detection platform based on our trained model (BiStageNet) using Pytorch.
Results: Our DE detection platform achieved a mean Dice coefficient of 0.961 in premolar recognition, with a diagnostic accuracy of 85.0%, sensitivity of 88.0%, specificity of 82.0%, F1 Score of 0.854, and AUC of 0.93. Experimental results revealed that dental interns, when manually identifying DE, showed low specificity. With the tool's assistance, specificity significantly improved for all interns, effectively reducing false positives without sacrificing sensitivity. This led to enhanced diagnostic precision, evidenced by improved PPV, NPV, and F1-Scores.
Conclusion: Our BiStageNet was capable of recognizing premolars and detecting DE with high accuracy on intraoral photographs. On top of that, our self-developed DE detection platform was promising for clinical application and promotion.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11872327 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-05231-4 | DOI Listing |