98%
921
2 minutes
20
Introduction: Multiple primary malignancies (MPMs) refer to two or more primary malignant tumors in the same patient. MPMs are frequent: 18.4% of incident cancers represent a second or a higher primary cancer. In order to assess the value of genetic testing for patients with multiple cancers, studies are needed to accurately determine the prevalence of pathogenic variants for these patients.
Methods: All families were seen in our oncogenetics consultation from 2010 to 2022. We compared clinical features and detection rates of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in a panel of up to 47 cancer predisposition genes in patients with ≥ 2 primary cancers (n = 348) versus a single primary cancer (n = 1422).
Results: A pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant was diagnosed in 27.3% of patients with 348 index patients with MPM, concerning 21 genes: BRCA1 (n = 27), BRCA2 (n = 19), MSH2 (n = 9), ATM (n = 8), MLH1 (n = 5), MSH6 (n = 6), TP53 (n = 4), CHEK2 (n = 4), PALB2 (n = 3), APC (n = 2), MEN1 (n = 1), RAD51C (n = 1), NBN (n = 1), EPCAM (n = 1), PMS2 (n = 1), RB1 (n = 1), PTEN (n = 1), CYLD1 (n = 1), NF1 (n = 1), RAD51D (n = 1), and CDKN2A (n = 1). MPM index cases were more likely to carry a deleterious mutation than cases with a single cancer (27.3% vs. 11.39%, p < 0.001). Pathogenic variants were found more frequently in patients with a suggestive family history (34.2% vs. 20.1%, p < 0.05), with a younger age of cancer diagnosis related to the suspected syndrome (32.7% vs. 22%, p = 0.049). For the 208 index patients with ≥ 2 cancers pertaining to the same predisposition syndrome (HBOC, HNPCC…), the detection rate increased significantly to 36% (vs. 14.3% for MPM patients with unrelated cancers (n = 140), p < 0.001). Conversely, the detection rate for patients with unrelated cancers was not statistically different from the single-cancer population (14.3%-11.39%, p = 0.318).
Conclusion: Patients referred for oncogenetic testing with MPM are more likely to carry pathogenic variants in cancer predisposition genes than patients with a single primary cancer (p < 0.05), especially if the cancers are related to the same predisposition syndrome. If the cancers are unrelated, no statistical difference in comparison to the single-cancer population was observed. For these latter patients, we recommend using the specific criteria of each tumor to propose appropriate genetic testing.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11871423 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.70086 | DOI Listing |
Haematologica
September 2025
Division of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Laboratory of Translational Immuno-Oncology, Department of Biomedicine, University and University Hospital Basel, Basel.
We previously used a disease-specific B cell receptor (BCR) point mutation (IGLV3-21R110) for selective targeting of a high-risk subset of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells. Since CLL is a disease of the elderly and a significant fraction of patients is not able to physically tolerate CAR T cell treatment, we explored bispecific antibodies as an alternative for precision targeting of this tumor mutation. Heterodimeric IgG1-based antibodies consisting of a fragment crystallizable region (Fc) attached to both an anti-IGLV3-21R110 Fab and an anti-CD3 (UCHT1) single chain variable fragment (R110-bsAb) selectively killed cell lines engineered to express high levels of the neoepitope as well as primary CLL cells using healthy donor and CLL patient-derived T cells as effectors.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMol Cancer Ther
September 2025
Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, United States.
The estrogen receptor (ER or ERα) remains the primary therapeutic target for luminal breast cancer, with current treatments centered on competitive antagonists, receptor down-regulators, and aromatase inhibitors. Despite these options, resistance frequently emerges, highlighting the need for alternative targeting strategies. We discovered a novel mechanism of ER inhibition that targets the previously unexplored interface between the DNA-binding domain (DBD) and ligand-binding domain (LBD) of the receptor.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInfect Control Hosp Epidemiol
September 2025
Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Objective: In the and genes have been associated with elevated MICs to antiseptics with such organisms often termed antiseptic tolerant (ATSA). The impact of repeated healthcare or antiseptic exposure on colonization with ATSA is uncertain.
Design: Prospective longitudinal cohort study.
Dig Endosc
September 2025
Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Objectives: Salvage endoscopic therapy is increasingly recommended for localized, superficial failure at the primary site after chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. This multicenter retrospective study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors associated with overall survival in patients who underwent salvage endoscopic therapy for cT1N0M0 local failure after chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with cT1N0M0 local failure after chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy who underwent endoscopic resection or photodynamic therapy using talaporfin sodium at two Japanese institutions between 2012 and 2021.
Am J Case Rep
September 2025
Department of Ophthalmology, Brasília University Hospital, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
BACKGROUND Uveal melanoma is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults, often diagnosed late in resource-limited settings. The diagnosis is made through a combination of clinical ophthalmologic examination, B-mode ultrasound, and histopathological study. This report details a case of a 67-year-old woman with progressive vision loss and ocular pain due to an inferomedial uveal melanoma to highlight therapeutic limitations from delayed diagnosis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF