98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Clinicians often deal with copy-number variants of unknown significance (CNVUS) when managing neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs). Variant classification is often complemented with textual comments, while the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)/Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) numerical scores are rarely reported. Our aim was to determine if the application of ACMG/ClinGen scoring and inheritance/segregation studies are relevant for the reclassification of CNVUS.
Methods: We retrieved 167 CNVUS (112 duplications, 55 heterozygous deletions) from test reports of 141 patients with NDD in a 5-year period. None of those testing reports included ACMG/ClinGen scoring information for the CNVUS. One clinical and one laboratorial geneticist independently applied the ACMG/ClinGen scoring system for CNVs. Final scores/categories were assessed for potential modification when adding inheritance/segregation criteria.
Results: 138 (83%) of the CNVUS retained the VUS classification, 14 (8%) changed to benign and 15 (9%) to (likely) pathogenic. Variants deemed benign (11 duplications, 3 deletions) mostly overlapped with ClinGen-established benign regions or were common in the general population; variants deemed (likely) pathogenic (all deletions) were either associated with unrelated autosomal recessive/later-onset autosomal dominant (AD) conditions, or with an AD NDD phenotype in a single case. Inheritance studies were available for 20 (12%) variants (17 inherited, 3 de novo), and none led to a change in classification. A simulation showed that adding inheritance information would also not change the classification of any other variant.
Conclusion: Application of the ACMG/ClinGen scoring system led by itself to reclassification of 17% of VUS, despite a very low increase in diagnostic yield (1/141, 0.7%). Additionally, segregation/inheritance studies in CNVUS were mostly irrelevant in most NDD cases, challenging their routine broad application in clinical practice.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jmg-2024-110144 | DOI Listing |
J Med Genet
March 2025
Medical Genetics Centre Dr. Jacinto Magalhães, Santo António University Hospital Center, Porto, Portugal.
Background: Clinicians often deal with copy-number variants of unknown significance (CNVUS) when managing neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs). Variant classification is often complemented with textual comments, while the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)/Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) numerical scores are rarely reported. Our aim was to determine if the application of ACMG/ClinGen scoring and inheritance/segregation studies are relevant for the reclassification of CNVUS.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFZhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi
August 2022
Comprehensive Prevention and Treatment Center for Birth Defects, Ningbo Women and Children's Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315000, China.
Objective: Through a retrospective large sample analysis of copy number variants in single center, we explored the technical standards for the interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy-number variants (CNVs) jointly proposed by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) in 2019, analyzing its impact on CNVs ratings and the improvement in the consistency of the classification of CNVs in clinical laboratories.
Methods: 236 CNVs that assessed as pathogenic, uncertain significant (including likely pathogenic, uncertain and likely benign) by the 2011 ACMG guidelines between August 2018 and December 2019 in our center were re-analyzed. Four working group members of the center reclassified and evaluated 235 CNVs according to 2019 ACMG guidelines.
Front Genet
March 2022
National Center for Clinical Laboratories, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing Hospital/National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China.
This study aimed to evaluate inter-laboratory classification concordance for copy number variants (CNVs) with a semiquantitative point-based scoring metric recommended by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and Clinical Genome Resources (ClinGen). A total of 234 CNVs distributed by the National Center of Clinical Laboratories (NCCLs), and 72 CNVs submitted by different laboratories, were distributed to nine clinical laboratories performing routine clinical CNV testing in China and independently classified across laboratories. The overall inter-laboratory complete classification concordance rate of the 234 distributed CNVs increased from 18% (41/234) to 76% (177/234) using the scoring metric compared to the laboratory's previous method.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Genomics
October 2021
BGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, 518083, Shenzhen, China.
Background: The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) presented technical standards for interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy-number variants in 2019 (the standards). Although ClinGen developed a web-based CNV classification calculator based on scoring metrics, it can only track and tally points that have been assigned based on observed evidence. Here, we developed AutoCNV (a semiautomatic automated CNV interpretation system) based on the standards, which can automatically generate predictions on 18 and 16 criteria for copy number loss and gain, respectively.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNucleic Acids Res
July 2021
Laboratoire de Génétique Médicale, U1112, INSERM, IGMA, FMTS, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.