Causes of Reoperations After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study Over 20 Years.

J Arthroplasty

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Published: September 2025


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Reoperations following total hip arthroplasty (THA) remain a major clinical challenge, with their incidence and socioeconomic burden rising despite advances in surgical techniques and prosthesis design. This study aimed to evaluate the predominant causes of reoperations following THA over two decades at a tertiary referral hospital, comparing trends between 2004 to 2013 and 2014 to 2023.

Methods: We analyzed all reoperations performed at a tertiary referral hospital between January 2004 and December 2023. A total of 515 hips (483 patients) were included after excluding multiple reoperations on the same hip. The causes of reoperation were stratified into two time periods (2004 to 2013 and 2014 to 2023) to analyze trends. The time interval from primary THA to reoperations was also evaluated.

Results: The main cause of reoperation after primary THA was aseptic loosening, accounting for 52.4% of cases, followed by infection (13.2%), periprosthetic fracture (PPF) (10.7%), wear/osteolysis (8.5%), ceramic fracture (5.8%), and instability/dislocation (5.6%). The proportion of aseptic loosening decreased significantly from 62.5 to 40.4%, while the proportions of infection, PPF, ceramic fracture, and instability/dislocation increased (P < 0.001). The causes of reoperation varied according to the time interval. Instability, PPF, and infection were early causes, and wear/osteolysis and aseptic loosening were relatively later causes of reoperations.

Conclusions: Aseptic loosening was the most common cause of reoperation following primary THA. However, the proportion of infection and PPF increased as a cause of reoperations, while the proportion of aseptic loosening decreased with time. Surgeons should consider that the main cause of reoperations differed according to the time interval from primary THA to reoperation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2025.02.032DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

aseptic loosening
20
primary tha
16
time interval
12
reoperations
8
total hip
8
hip arthroplasty
8
tertiary referral
8
referral hospital
8
2004 2013
8
2013 2014
8

Similar Publications

Introduction: the progressive increase in the volume of primary knee arthroplasty surgery is leading in parallel to an increase in revision surgeries, and this trend is expected to continue in the coming decades.

Material And Methods: a retrospective observational study with 203 interventions in 201 patients with knee arthroplasty revision surgery at our center between 2018-2022, including the variables age, sex, body mass index, primary implant, time until revision surgery, mechanical alignment of the primary implant, cause of revision, revision implant, and need for secondary revision.

Results: the average age of the patients was 73.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Bilateral Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head and Proximal Femur After Corticosteroid Injections: A Case Report.

J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev

September 2025

From the Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Scottsdale, AZ (Ms. Hiredesai and Mr. Holle), and the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ (Dr. Van Schuyver, Dr. Deckey, Dr. Probst, and Dr. Spangehl).

Atraumatic bilateral osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a rare phenomenon whose etiology is not fully understood. In this report, we describe the case of a 75-year-old female patient who developed rapidly onset bilateral ONFH after intra-articular corticosteroid injections. She was treated with staged bilateral total hip arthroplasty.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Soft-Tissue Sources of Extra-articular Pain Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive Review.

J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev

September 2025

From the American Hip Institute Research Foundation (Dr. Quesada-Jimenez, Dr. Kahana-Rojkind, and Dr. Domb), and the American Hip Institute, Chicago, IL (Dr. Domb).

Hip pain after a total hip arthroplasty is a prevalent condition. Once aseptic loosening and infection have been ruled out, the possible entities are vast. Accurate diagnosis in this patient population is challenging because they might present in different stages of their recovery process and the potential overlap of some conditions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Robotic-Assisted Versus Manual Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed for Hip Dysplasia.

J Am Acad Orthop Surg

September 2025

From the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY (Neitzke, O'Donnell, Buchalter, Chandi, Westrich, and Gausden), the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI (O'Donnell), and Somers Orthopaedic Surgery & Sports Medicine Group

Introduction: Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) poses challenges for component positioning during total hip arthroplasty (THA) secondary to abnormal bone morphology, soft-tissue contractures, and hip center migration. The objective of this study was to evaluate the radiographic and clinical outcomes of THA for DDH performed with robotic assistance versus manual (M) technique.

Methods: A retrospective review identified 115 patients with Crowe II to IV dysplasia undergoing primary THA at a single institution from 2016 to 2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Durable and biologically integrated fixation is critical for long-term implant survival in patients with primary bone tumors. However, limited evidence exists regarding the long-term outcomes of uncemented stem designs in this population. Specifically, we investigated: (1) the long-term patient and implant survivorship rates; (2) the influence of factors such as resection length and patient age on implant survival; and (3) the incidence and types of complications, particularly those requiring implant removal or revision.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF