98%
921
2 minutes
20
Introduction: Lifelong follow-up care for childhood cancer survivors (CCS) is recommended and ideally involves both medical and psychosocial care. It is important for CCS and their families to be adequately informed about what to expect after cancer treatment completion to ensure they receive appropriate care. This study aimed to describe patterns of access to survivorship care among a multi-national sample, as well as examine unmet information and support needs, for CCS and their parents.
Method: An online survey, developed by pediatric psycho-oncology experts and people with lived experience of pediatric cancer, was distributed by the World Health Organization. This study presents a subanalysis from these data.
Results: Participants included 102 parents of CCS (94 females, mean age 45 years, mean time since child's diagnosis 9 years), and 43 CCS (28 females, mean age 31 years, mean time since diagnosis 21 years) from 17 countries. Thirty-five percent of CCS (13/37) were not accessing survivorship care. Most parents (95%; 97/102) and CCS (76%; 31/41) reported a desire for discussion of emotional impacts following cancer treatment completion; however, this did not occur for 69% (70/102) of parents and 46% (19/41) of CCS. Additionally, 92% (93/102) of parents and 83% (33/41) of CCS reported an unmet need for more information about what to expect after cancer treatment. Most CCS (54%; 22/41) reported feeling "somewhat-not at all" supported by healthcare professionals in the period after cancer treatment.
Conclusion: Discussions regarding emotional well-being and ongoing needs post treatment are lacking in cancer survivorship care worldwide.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pbc.31593 | DOI Listing |
J Cancer Surviv
September 2025
Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 203 Lothrop St # 500, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Purpose: Despite its importance, little is known about the patterns and predictors of Survivorship Clinic attendance in head and neck cancer (HNC). We sought to determine the cumulative incidence of Survivorship Clinic attendance stratified by demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic factors, and to identify factors independently associated with attendance.
Methods: Our analysis population consisted of 2,252 patients diagnosed with primary HNC and seen at our institution's HNC Survivorship Clinic after completing treatment from 2016-2021.
J Natl Cancer Inst
September 2025
Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Nearly 20 million people in the U.S. are living with and beyond a cancer diagnosis, many of whom survive for decades after treatment.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAJPM Focus
October 2025
Division of Health Systems, Policy, and Innovation, School of Nursing, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Introduction: Food insecurity negatively affects timely access to care, treatment adherence, quality of life, and survival among cancer survivors. There is limited knowledge about cancer survivors' comfort with sharing food insecurity risk for clinical care on a national scale. This study aims to assess comfort with sharing food insecurity risk for clinical care among adults with and without a cancer history and to identify factors that may be associated with comfort for sharing food insecurity risk.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCancer Causes Control
September 2025
Division of Population Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Cancer Center, 6500 Wilshire Blvd, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
Background: Breast cancer survivors have an increased risk of second primary cancers (SPCs), the role of county-level socioeconomic status and rurality-factors that may influence access to treatment, surveillance, and preventive care-remains understudied.
Methods: We identified 721,957 women with localized/regional first primary breast cancer who survived ≥ 1 year in 17 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries (2000-2018). We used Cox regression to assess associations between county-level median household income (proxy for socioeconomic status), rurality, and their joint effects on invasive SPC risk, adjusting for demographic and clinical factors.
Eur J Epidemiol
September 2025
Institute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.