98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background & Aims: Functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) panometry provides assessment of the esophagogastric junction opening and esophageal body contractile activity during an endoscopic procedure and is increasingly being incorporated into comprehensive esophageal motility assessments. The aim of this study was to provide a standardized approach and vocabulary to the procedure and interpretation and update the motility classification scheme.
Methods: A working group of 19 FLIP panometry experts convened in a modified Delphi consensus process to produce and assess statements on the FLIP panometry procedure and interpretation. Three rounds of voting were conducted on an agreement scale of 1-9 for appropriateness, followed by face-to-face discussions and an opportunity for revisions of statements. The "percent agreement" was the proportion of votes with score ≥7 indicating level of agreement on appropriateness.
Results: A total of 40 statements were selected for final inclusion in the Dallas Consensus, including FLIP panometry protocol, interpretation of esophagogastric junction opening and contractile response, and motility classification scheme. Key statements included: "FLIP panometry should be interpreted in the context of the clinical presentation, the accompanying EGD [esophagogastroduodenoscopy] findings and other relevant complementary testing" (median response 9.0; 100% agreement). "A major motor disorder is unlikely in the setting of a 'normal' FLIP panometry classification" (median response 9.0; 94% agreement). "Diminished or absent contractile response with reduced esophageal opening (ie, nonspastic obstruction) supports the diagnosis of a disorder of EGJ [esophagogastric junction] outflow" (median response 8.5; 94% agreement).
Conclusions: The standardized approach for performance and interpretation of the Dallas Consensus can facilitate use of FLIP panometry in broad clinical settings.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12104001 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2025.01.234 | DOI Listing |
Dig Dis Sci
August 2025
Women Medical and Dental College, Abbottabad, KPK, Pakistan.
Surg Endosc
August 2025
Division of Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Endeavor Health, Evanston, IL, USA.
Introduction: The advent of functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) and panometry provides an additional means of evaluating esophageal motility in addition to conventional manometry. Beginning in 2022, our group began preferentially utilizing intraoperative panometry for anti-reflux operations to improve patient comfort and efficiency of access. This study aims to explore the changes in peri-operative and postoperative outcomes since implementing intraoperative FLIP panometry to evaluate esophageal motility.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFGastroenterology
August 2025
Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Motility, The University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
Dig Dis Sci
June 2025
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Background: Visual or haptic assessments of the pylorus during endoscopy may result in the diagnosis of a pylorospasm. However, subjective assessments may be affected by inter-rater variability, the antro-duodenal motility phase and the distance to scope. We evaluated to what extent the visual impression, the endoscopic resistance to pyloric intubation and gastric contents correlate with objectively determined values using EndoFLIP measurements.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNeurogastroenterol Motil
May 2025
Baylor Scott & White Center for Esophageal Diseases, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Background: During pre-bariatric surgery evaluation, we routinely perform objective testing for GERD (endoscopy, pH monitoring if no reflux esophagitis found) with high-resolution manometry (HRM) and functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) to evaluate esophageal motility. In this study, we aimed to identify differences in FLIP metrics between obese patients with and without GERD.
Methods: We reviewed our clinical database of obese patients evaluated for bariatric surgery, including surgery-naïve patients and patients who had sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) that resulted in inadequate weight loss.