98%
921
2 minutes
20
Sepsis is one of the leading causes of mortality in hospital settings, and early diagnosis is a crucial challenge to improve clinical outcomes. Artificial intelligence (AI) is emerging as a valuable resource to address this challenge, with numerous investigations exploring its application to predict and diagnose sepsis early, as well as personalizing its treatment. Machine learning (ML) models are able to use clinical data collected from hospital Electronic Health Records or continuous monitoring to predict patients at risk of sepsis hours before the onset of symptoms. : Over the past few decades, ML and other AI tools have been explored extensively in sepsis, with models developed for the early detection, diagnosis, prognosis, and even real-time management of treatment strategies. : This review was conducted according to the SPIDER (Sample, Phenomenon of Interest, Design, Evaluation, Research Type) framework to define the study methodology. A critical overview of each paper was conducted by three different reviewers, selecting those that provided original and comprehensive data relevant to the specific topic of the review and contributed significantly to the conceptual or practical framework discussed, without dwelling on technical aspects of the models used. : A total of 194 articles were found; 28 were selected. Articles were categorized and analyzed based on their focus-early prediction, diagnosis, mortality or improvement in the treatment of sepsis. The scientific literature presents mixed outcomes; while some studies demonstrate improvements in mortality rates and clinical management, others highlight challenges, such as a high incidence of false positives and the lack of external validation. This review is designed for clinicians and healthcare professionals, and aims to provide an overview of the application of AI in sepsis management, reviewing the main studies and methodologies used to assess its effectiveness, limitations, and future potential.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11722371 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm14010286 | DOI Listing |
EBioMedicine
September 2025
Department of Radiology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong, 264000, PR China; Big Data and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong, 264000, PR China. Electronic address:
J Particip Med
September 2025
Participatory Health, 20 Grasmere Ave, Fairfield, CT, 06824, United States, 1 (212) 280-1600.
JMIR Res Protoc
September 2025
State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China.
[This corrects the article DOI: .].
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJMIR Cancer
September 2025
iCARE Secure Data Environment & Digital Collaboration Space, NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom.
Background: Electronic health records (EHRs) are a cornerstone of modern health care delivery, but their current configuration often fragments information across systems, impeding timely and effective clinical decision-making. In gynecological oncology, where care involves complex, multidisciplinary coordination, these limitations can significantly impact the quality and efficiency of patient management. Few studies have examined how EHR systems support clinical decision-making from the perspective of end users.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Med Internet Res
September 2025
School of Advertising, Marketing and Public Relations, Faculty of Business and Law, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Background: Labor shortages in health care pose significant challenges to sustaining high-quality care for people with intellectual disabilities. Social robots show promise in supporting both people with intellectual disabilities and their health care professionals; yet, few are fully developed and embedded in productive care environments. Implementation of such technologies is inherently complex, requiring careful examination of facilitators and barriers influencing sustained use.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF