Article Synopsis

  • The study evaluates the benefits of both germline and somatic genomic testing for patients with metastatic prostate cancer, determining how these tests can influence treatment decisions and prognosis.
  • A systematic review identified 14 relevant studies from a vast pool of 1,713 papers, primarily comprising systematic reviews and clinical trials that examine the efficacy of genomic tests.
  • The recommendations advocate for the use of panel-based DNA sequencing for all patients, highlighting its role in treatment with PARP inhibitors and implications for cancer screening in relatives, while suggesting further testing in specific clinical scenarios.

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate evidence on germline and somatic genomic testing for patients with metastatic prostate cancer and provide recommendations.

Methods: A systematic review by a multidisciplinary panel with patient representation was conducted. The PubMed database was searched from January 2018 to May 2024. Articles were selected for inclusion if they reported on patients with metastatic prostate cancer who received a germline or somatic genomic test and/or made comparisons between those tests, reported detection rates, prognostic information, or treatment implications.

Results: A total of 1,713 papers were identified in the literature search. After applying the eligibility criteria, 14 remained: eight systematic reviews and six clinical trials.

Recommendations: Patients with metastatic prostate cancer should undergo both germline and somatic DNA sequencing using panel-based assays. These tests can guide the use of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, which have a survival benefit in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. In addition, germline testing may have screening implications for additional cancers for patients and cascade testing implications for family members. The data supporting when to perform repeat testing and optimal tissue type to use (eg, primary tumor metastatic biopsy versus circulating tumor DNA [ctDNA] testing) are more limited, but this panel recommends considering retesting in patients whose results were previously negative or uninformative, and to consider either a metastatic biopsy or ctDNA when a significant change in clinical status occurs. Next-generation genomic sequencing findings that are associated with prognostic only (and not predictive) value should not be used to guide treatment outside of a clinical trial.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/genitourinary-cancer-guidelines.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO-24-02608DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

prostate cancer
20
germline somatic
16
metastatic prostate
16
somatic genomic
12
patients metastatic
12
genomic testing
8
metastatic biopsy
8
metastatic
7
testing
6
germline
5

Similar Publications

Background: With the advancement of MR-based imaging, prostate cancer ablative therapies have seen increased interest to reduce complications of prostate cancer treatment. Although less invasive, they do carry procedural risks, including rectal injury. To date, the medicolegal aspects of ablative therapy remain underexplored.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Docetaxel is the most common chemotherapy regimen for several neoplasms, including advanced OSCC (Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma). Unfortunately, chemoresistance leads to relapse and adverse disease outcomes.

Methods: We performed CRISPR-based kinome screening to identify potential players of Docetaxel resistance.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Effects of a Patient Decision Aid for Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer Established in Routine Care: The Randomized Controlled EvEnt-PCA Trial.

Eur Urol Focus

September 2025

Department of Urology, Medical Centre, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Urology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Department of Urology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

Background And Objective: Since 2016, >21 000 patients with prostate cancer (PC) used our personalized online decision aid in routine care in Germany. We analyzed the effects of this online decision aid for men with nonmetastatic PC in a randomized controlled trial.

Methods: In the randomized controlled EvEnt-PCA trial, 116 centers performed 1:1 allocation of 1115 patients with nonmetastatic PC to use an online decision aid (intervention = I) or a printed brochure (control = C).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF