The Changes in Cross-Resistance, Fitness, and Feeding Behavior in as Their Resistance to Sulfoxaflor Declines.

Insects

State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.

Published: November 2024


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

The increasing resistance in field populations to sulfoxaflor and many different types of insecticides represents a significant challenge in protecting cotton production in China. Although resistant pests were able to regain their susceptibility to insecticides after the reduction in insecticide applications, some of their biological parameters remained different from susceptible strains. The resistance to sulfoxaflor was unstable in after the loss of selective pressure. The strain with declined resistance (Sul-D) (RR = 1.11-fold) restored its susceptibility to sulfoxaflor, acetamiprid, and imidacloprid after the sulfoxaflor-resistant (Sul-R) (RR = 51.57-fold) was maintained without insecticide pressure for 22 generations. Sul-R had a relative fitness of 0.87, and the Sul-D strain still had a relative fitness of 0.84, even if its susceptibility to sulfoxaflor was restored. Compared with the susceptible strain (Sus), the Sul-R and Sul-D strains became more active in searching for appropriate feeding positions because they generated more intercellular apoplastic stylar pathway events (C). However, the phloem-feeding ability was reduced in the Sul-R and Sul-D strains, as shown by the decrease in phloem behavioral parameters, such as phloem salivations (E1), phloem ingestion (E2), and the percentages of E1 and E2. The negative hormesis effect of sulfoxaflor on phloem feeding was observed in susceptible strain but not in Sul-R and Sul-D, as evidenced by the significant decreases in the number of E1, the duration of E1 and E2, and the percentage of E1 and E2 in the Sus strain. Sulfoxaflor resistance was unstable in . , and there was still a fitness cost to . after recovering susceptibility to sulfoxaflor. The phloem-feeding ability was reduced in the Sul-R and Sul-D strains compared with the Sus strain, but the negative hormesis effect of sulfoxaflor on phloem feeding was only found in the Sus strain. The outcomes of this study could contribute to a comprehensive risk assessment and provide a basis for developing a better strategy to control . .

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11676874PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects15120920DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sul-r sul-d
16
susceptibility sulfoxaflor
12
sul-d strains
12
sus strain
12
sulfoxaflor
9
resistance sulfoxaflor
8
relative fitness
8
susceptible strain
8
phloem-feeding ability
8
ability reduced
8

Similar Publications

The Changes in Cross-Resistance, Fitness, and Feeding Behavior in as Their Resistance to Sulfoxaflor Declines.

Insects

November 2024

State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.

The increasing resistance in field populations to sulfoxaflor and many different types of insecticides represents a significant challenge in protecting cotton production in China. Although resistant pests were able to regain their susceptibility to insecticides after the reduction in insecticide applications, some of their biological parameters remained different from susceptible strains. The resistance to sulfoxaflor was unstable in after the loss of selective pressure.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF